Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd. vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Law And Justice Through The Joint Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO. 12 COURT NO.4 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).132/2012 (From the judgement and order dated 23/09/2011 in WPC No.6376/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) NIRULAS CORNER HOUSE PVT.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 2659 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 1429 of 2012 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) (With I.A. No. 1 -appln. for direction) Date: 27/01/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE For Petitioner(s) Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Sunil Fernandes,Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Adv. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Adv. Mr. U.A. Rana, Adv. Ms. Devina Sehgal, Adv. for M/S Gagrat & Co., Advs. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) No. 132/2012-Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd.& SLP(C) No. 1429/2012- M/s Mohan Clothing Co.P. Ltd.) Learned counsel for the appellants in these ..2/- : 2 : appeals pray for time to file additional affidavit, indicating the amount of arrears towards service tax as on 30th September, 2011. Let them do so within one week. List thereafter. SLP(C) No. 2659/2012 (Thomas Cook India Ltd.) Mr. Haksar,learned senior counsel appearing for
the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition stating that the petitioner would like to move the High Court for review of the impugned judgment as the facts in the petitioner's case were entirely different from
the facts in other cases which have been decided by the full bench by a common judgment. Accordingly, The special leave petition is dismissed as not pressed. It goes without saying that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the submissions made by learned counsel. As and when the review application is filed, it will be considered on its own merits, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this petition.
[ Charanjeet Kaur ] [ P.S. Tyagi ] Court Master Court Master