Ritika Singala vs. State Of U. P
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.13 REGISTRAR COURT SECTION III-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Civil Appeal No(s). 6191/2023 ARUN KAPOOR Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. Respondent(s) [Only C.A. No. 6200/2023 and SLP (C) No. 8657/2024 are listed under this item] WITH C.A. No. 6200/2023 (III-A) SLP(C) No. 8657/2024 (XI) Date : 28-04-2025 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dr. Rajeev Sharma, AOR Ms. Km Monika, Adv. Mr. Viresh Kumar Bhawra, Adv. Mr. Manish Arora, Adv. Ms. Parul Shukla, AOR Mr. Saday Mondol, Adv. Ms. Shubhangi Pandey, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajinder Singh, AOR Mr. Rajat Rana, Adv. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, AOR Mr. Abhimanyu Verma, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6200/2023 Service is complete on respondent No.1. Ld. counsel
who entered appearance for respondent No.1 on the last date of hearing has not filed any vakalatnama or counter affidavit yet, despite the grant of two opportunities. None is present either. Digitally signed by RUPAM DHAMIJA Date: 2025.04.29 16:56:56 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
Contd….
Respondent No.2 is granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.
It has been submitted by Ld. counsel for the appellant that respondent No.3 is merely a proforma respondent and application would be moved seeking deletion of the same. Let any such application be moved within two weeks. If application is filed within two weeks, let the same be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions, otherwise too the matter be laid before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers due to default.
SLP(C) No. 8657/2024
Service is complete on respondent Nos.3 and 4 but none has entered appearance.
Service is complete on respondent No.1. Ld. counsel who entered appearance for respondent No.1 on the last date of hearing, has not filed any vakalatnama or counter affidavit yet. None is present either.
Ld.Counsel for the petitioner has failed to take fresh steps and to file fresh particulars, despite the grant of last opportunity, for service on respondent No.2.
Registry to process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for necessary directions.