Gyadhar Parida vs. The State Of Orissa
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
24 Feb 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2232/2023
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 05-01-2023 in CRLREV No. 302/2022 passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack)
GYADHAR PARIDA & ANR. Petitioners
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ORISSA Respondent
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)
Date : 24-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, AOR | |
---|---|---|
Mr. G. Arudhra Rao, Adv. | ||
Ms. Geetanjali Das Krishnan, Adv. | ||
Ms. Nikita Jaydevan, Adv. | ||
Mr. Nabab Singh, Adv. | ||
For Respondent(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Subhranshu Dash, Adv. Mr. Satyajeet Mahanty, Adv. Mr. Karthik Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jithin Babu, Adv. Mr. Tejas N, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Mallick, Adv. Mr. Abhay Sahu, Adv. Mr. Adarsh P.g, Adv. Mr. Bismay Dash, Adv. Ms. Shalini Mishra, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Heard Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Nagamuthu, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners in the application filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) on Digitally signed by NITIN TALREJA Date: 2023.02.25 12:47:44 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
the basis of which the present petitioners have been arrayed as accused in the case.
We have noticed the reasoning of the High Court in upholding the order of the learned trial court in arraying three additional accused and see no reason to interfere with the said decision. In our opinion, the exercise of power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. in the present matter cannot be faulted. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(NITIN TALREJA) (KAMLESH RAWAT)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)