Mumbai Metro One Pvt. Ltd vs. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4890/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07/01/2016 in WP No. 1984/2011 passed by the High Court of Bombay) MUMBAI METRO ONE PVT. LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report) Date : 08/04/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Petitioner(s) Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr.Adv. Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Hasan Maurtaza, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Mishra, Adv. Mr. Alok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Amit Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr.Adv. Mrs.Jayshree Wad, Adv. Mr. Ashish Wad, Adv. Mr. P.V. Naik, Adv. Ms. Paromita Majumdar, Adv. Ms. Jaya Khanna, Adv.fsor M/s. J. S. Wad & Co. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned senior counsel for the parties. We do not find it to be a fit case for exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The special leave petition is hence dismissed. We make it clear that we Digitally signed by USHA RANI BHARDWAJ Date: 2016.04.09 10:28:09 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

have not considered the matter on merits. It is further made clear that if the alternate remedy is invoked by the petitioner within

1

two weeks from today, the same may not be rejected on the ground of limitation since the petitioner has been pursuing the remedy before this Court.

(USHA BHARDWAJ) (RENU DIWAN) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER