Shiv Hare Builders Through Sri Satish Chand Shiv Hare Proprietor vs. The Executive Engineer Provincial Division

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Apr 2011
CNR:SCIN010052602011

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6088/2011

(From the judgement and order dated 26/11/2010 in CMAA No. 27/2008 & CMRA No.145086/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)

M/S SHIV HARE BUILDERS Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

EXEC.ENG.& ORS. Respondent(s)

(With prayer for interim relief )

WITH S.L.P.(C)...CC NO. 5911 of 2011 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and office report)

Date: 01/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPH

For Petitioner(s)Dr.Sumant Bharadwaj, Adv.
Mr.Archana Pathak Dave, Adv.
Mr.Ajit Kumar Gupta, Adv.
Mr.Amit Verma, Adv.
Mr.Viveka Nand, Adv.
Ms.Mridula Ray Bharadwaj, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that in terms of Clause 32 of the Memorandum of Agreement, which is the arbitration clause, the petitioner was required within 28 days of receipt of notice of the final decision, to give a notice for the matter to be referred to arbitration. According to the petitioner, notice of the final decision was received on 11th January, 2008, and notice was given by the petitioner for appointment of an Arbitrator on 4th February, 2008, which is well within the period of 28 days, contemplated in Clause 32(b) of the Agreement. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to show us any document in support of his submission that the notice had been received by the petitioner on 11th January, 2008.

Let this matter be adjourned for two weeks to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file additional documents, including the letter dated 11th January, 2008, said to have been written by the Superintendent Engineer, Agra Region, Public Works Department, Agra.

(Chetan Kumar) (Juginder Kaur) Court Master Court Master

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(26) - 1 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(25) - 29 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 27 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 23 Mar 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(22) - 14 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 1 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 1 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 1 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 25 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 25 Apr 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 25 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 14 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 14 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 1 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 1 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 1 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 Dec 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 2 Sept 2013

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 2 Sept 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 3 Oct 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 21 Sept 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 11 Nov 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 2 Sept 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 15 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Apr 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 11 Mar 2011

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view