Gurjeet Singh Johar vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman, Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [21-09-2021]
Listed On:
8 Jun 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
29753/2021,29755/2021,32455/2021,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.14 Court 2 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3681-3682/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 18-02-2021 in CWP No. 11539/2020 18-02-2021 in CWP No. 11688/2020 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
GURJEET SINGH JOHAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
IA No. 29753/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No. 32455/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES & IA No. 29755/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES
WITH SLP(C) No. 3797/2021 (IV-B) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.30943/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.30944/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES)
Date : 08-07-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI
For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Adv. | |
---|---|---|
Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR | ||
Mr. Arav Pandit, Adv. | ||
Ms. Ananya Sikri, Adv. |
For Respondent(s) Mr. M.L Sharma, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR
Mr. R S Suri, ASG Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. Mr. Mehul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR
Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AOR Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, AOR
Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2021.07.08 17:27:27 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Adjourned by one week.
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI)