Gurjeet Singh Johar vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Manoj Misra
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4]
Listed On:
18 Apr 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
29753/2021,29755/2021,32455/2021,93377/2021,142711/2021,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 3681-3682/2021
(Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 18-02-2021 in CWP No. 11539/2020 18-02-2021 in CWP No. 11688/2020 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh)
GURJEET SINGH JOHAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No. 93377/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 29753/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 142711/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 32455/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 29755/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 3797/2021 (IV-B) (IA No. 93385/2021 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 30944/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES)
SLP(C) No. 7230/2021 (XVII-A) (IA No. 61920/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date : 18-04-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, AOR
Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Adv. Ms. Rooh-e-hina Dua, AOR Mr. Sangram S. Saron, Adv. Mr. Harshit Khanduja, Adv.
For Respondent(s) | Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, AOR<br>Mr. Lakshmi Kantham, Adv. |
---|---|
Ms. Shilpa Gamnani, Adv.<br>Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR |
Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR
Mr. K.m Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. Mrs. Preeti Rani, Adv. Mr. Saurav Mishra, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Arora, Adv. Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, AOR Mr. Anmol Amit Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Parteek Kumar, Adv. Mr. M.L. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Surender Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Mr. Kundan Kumar Mishra, AOR Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. H.K. Monga, Adv. Mr. Mohit Monga, Adv. Ms. Megha Gaur, Adv. Mr. Vibhav Mishra, Adv. Mr. Ekansh Bansal, Adv. Mr. Parmanand Gaur, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for time to file additional document and bring on record the subsequent developments.
On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that these matters have practically become infructuous. Moreover, the petitioners should have availed alternate remedy under Section 27A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, before the National Consumer Dispute Resolution Commission.
The matters be relisted accordingly after four weeks.
(NITIN TALREJA) (MALEKAR NAGARAJ) COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER
2