Gurjeet Singh Johar vs. Union Of India

ITEM NO.22 Court 11 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).7230/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-05-2021 in EP No.379/2018 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bangalore)

DISHA CHOWDHARY Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UMA RAVISHANKAR & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.61920/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, IA No.61920/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 12-07-2021 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. A. Lakshminarayanan, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

In view of the letter circulated by learned counsel for the petitioner, matter is adjourned for a week.

However, on perusal of the last order dated 25.05.2021 passed by this Court, it is found that there is a typographical mistake in the third last paragraph beginning with 'Be that as it may'. The words "and when the", appearing in between the words 'custody at present' and 'let notice be issued', have been inserted by mistake Signature Not Verified

and are, thus, deleted. Digitally signed by

ASHWANI KUMAR Date: 2021.07.13 16:51:38 IST Reason:

The said paragraph be read as under:

"Be that as it may, in view of the submissions made and

pendency of issue in this Court in the petitions above referred; and when the petitioner is shown to be in custody at present, let notice be issued in this matter, returnable in two weeks."

(ARJUN BISHT) (PRADEEP KUMAR) (ASHWANI THAKUR) (COURT MASTER (SH) (BRANCH OFFICER) AR-CUM-PS