eCourtsIndia

Ashfaq Husen vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Surya Kant
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:24 Sept 2021
CNR:SCIN010051702020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Mention Memo

Before:

Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Case Allowed

Listed On:

24 Sept 2021

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

33390/2020,49909/2021,

Order Text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.126/2020

ASHFAQ HUSEN & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

On hearing learned counsel for the petitioners, it was put to the learned counsel that in view of the given circumstances, including the order of detention under NSA reciting the ground reality and the episodes alleged to have occurred in the Court and the affidavits of the counsel for the petitioners, the transfer can be made to another place but there is no necessity to transfer it out of the State of U.P.. On such a query being put, learned counsel for the petitioners requests that the matter be transferred to Prayagraj, U.P.

Learned counsel for the State however, submits that there are nearer Districts to Lucknow where the matter can be transferred as the travelling distance between Lucknow to Prayagraj by the express way would still be over three hours. There are stated to be 173 witnesses.

Digitally signed by Charanjeet kaur Date: 2021.09.28 15:48:53 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified

On the aforesaid plea, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the transfer to Barabanki or to Rai Bareilly would not give the best of legal assistance to the petitioners, which was available in Lucknow and can be made available at Prayagraj.

In the conspectus of all the facts and circumstances, it is found appropriate to transfer the trial of the case to the District Court, Prayagraj. U.P. Ordered accordingly

The transfer Petition is, accordingly, allowed.

………………………………………….J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]

NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER 24, 2021. ITEM NO.27 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Transfer Petition(Criminal) No. 126/2020

ASHFAQ HUSEN & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 49909/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. IA No. 33390/2020 - STAY APPLICATION)

Date : 24-09-2021 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

  • For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. Mr. Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR Mr. Ejaz M. Qureshi, Adv. Mr. Rahul Narang, Adv.
  • For Respondent(s) Mr. V.K. Shukla, Sr. Adv. Mr. Adarsh Upadhyay, AOR Mr. Ajay Kr. Prajapati, Adv. Mr. Amol Chitravanshi, Adv.
    • Mr. Hari Shankar Jain, Adv. Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR
  • UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The transfer petition is allowed in terms of

the signed order.

Pending applications stand disposed of.

[CHARANJEET KAUR][POONAM VAID]
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PSCOURT MASTER (NSH)

[ Signed order is placed on the file ]

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(5) - 24 Sept 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(4) - 24 Nov 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 14 Oct 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 3 Sept 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 5 Mar 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view