The Director General (Vig) And Cvo vs. State Through The Inspector Of Police
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION II
MATTER FOR : 09.05.2016 R.COURT NO. 01
ITEM NO. 37
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRIMINAL) NO.5838 OF 2014
WITH
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 161 OF 2015
(Application for deletion of the name of respondent No.1)
Manju Surana ...Petitioner
VERSUS
Sunil Arora and Ors ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
SLP(Crl) No.5838/2014
The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 29.02.2016, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:
"Four weeks time is granted to the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1,2,3,5,6, and 8 to file the counter affidavit.
None appears for Respondent No. 7 despite due service. The time granted as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit to the Respondent No. 1 has not expired as per order dated 09.02.2016 of this Court. As such he is at liberty to file the same within the granted time period. Respondent No. 2 has already filed the counter affidavit.
Four weeks time is granted to the learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3 to file the counter affidavit.
List again on 09.05.2016."
It is submitted that Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, Advocate has on 29.03.2016 filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No. 1 after obtaining NOC from erstwhile Advocate Mr.Sanjay Jain.
It is further submitted that Counsel for the Respondent No. 1,2,3,5,6 and 8 has not filed counter affidavit on their behalf so far.
It is submitted that Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Advocate has filed counter affidavit to the application for deletion filed by respondent No. 1 and the same was defective for not serving the copy to the counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,6 and 8.Counsel for the Petitioner has been intimated vide this Registry's letter dated 10.09.2015.Defects are not cured so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate who was earlier counsel for the respondent No. 1 has filed rejoinder affidavit to the counter affidavit to the application for deletion filed by Mr.Sanjay Jain and the same was defective for the reason that it was not served to the counsel for the respondent No. 2, 5 and 8. Counsel for the respondent has been intimated vide this Registry's letter dated 14.10.2015. Defects are not cured so far.
It is further submitted that show cause notice in respect of directions of Hon'ble Court's order dated 13.07.2015 in Crl.M.P. No. 161/2015 (Application for deletion of respondent No.1) was issued to all the parties on 07.04.2016 and neither A.D.Card nor unserved cover containing show cause notice has been received back in respect of all the respondents so far.
Service of show cause notice is incomplete on all the respondents in the application for deletion of respondent No. 1 in the matter abovementioned.
However service of show cause notice issued in the main matter pursuant to this Hon'ble Court's Order dated 11.08.2014 is complete on respondents.
The matter abovementioned are listed before the Ld.Registrar Court with this office report.
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF April, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Advocate
- Mr. Rajeev Sharma,Advocate
- Mr. Gautam Jha,Advocate
- Mr. Nachiketa Joshi,Advocate
- Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, Advocate
- Mr. Merusagar Samantaray,Advocate
- Mr. Nishant R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SECTION II
MATTER FOR : 29.02.2016 R.COURT NO. 01 ITEM NO. 23
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRIMINAL) NO.5838 OF 2014
WITH
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 161 OF 2015 (Application for deletion of the name of respondent No.1)
Manju Surana ...Petitioner
Sunil Arora and Ors ...Respondents
AND PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CRIMINAL) NO.1092 OF 2015 Ambhuj Kumar Sharma ...Petitioner VERSUS
VERSUS
Ajay Kumar Gehlot and Anr ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
SLP(Crl) No.5838/2014
The matter abovementioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 11th August, 2014, when the Hon'ble Court was pleased to pass the following Order:
"Issue notice returnable in six weeks. Notice will be issued to all the respondents except respondent No. 4 for the time being. Dasti in addition to the ordinary prcocess is permitted."
Accordingly show cause notice returnable on 19th September, 2014 was issued to all the respondents except respondent No. 4 by registered A.D.post as well as by dasti through counsel for the Petitioner on 20.08.2014.
It is submitted that Mr. Sanjay Jain,Advocate; Mr. Merusagar Samantaray,Advocate;Mr.Gautam Jha,Advocate,Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Advocate;Mr.Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate and Mr. Rajeev Sharma,Advocate has filed vakalatnam on behalf of respondent Nos.1,2,3,5,6 and 8 respectively.
A.D.Cards duly signed have been received back from respondent No.7 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Jain,Advocate has on 03.12.2014 filed an application for deletion of name of respondent No. 1 from the array of parties which is registered as Crl.M.P. No. 161/2015 and subsequently listed before Hon'ble Judge in Chambers on 13.07.2015 when the following Order was passed.
"Issue notice on Crl.M.P. No. 161/2015 returnable in four weeks."
It is further submitted that Mr. Sanjay Jain,Advocate has not filed the spare copies hence notice could not be issued so far.
Service of show cause notice is incomplete on all the respondents in the application for deletion of respondent No. 7 in the matter abovementioned.
However service of show cause notice issued in the main matter pursuant to this Hon'ble Court's Order dated 11.08.2014 is complete on respondents.
SLP(Crl) No.1092/2015
The matter abovementioned was listed before Ld.Registrar Court on 09th February, 2016; when the following Order was passed:
"Four weeks' time as last opportunity is granted to respondent No. 1 for filing counter affidavit. Respondent No. 2 has already filed the counter affidavit. List again on 05.04.2016."
It is submitted that counsel for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit on his behalf so far.
Service of show cause notice is complete on both the respondents.
The matters abovementioned are listed before the Ld.Registrar Court with this office report.
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF February, 2016.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to : Mr.Prashant Bhushan,Advocate Mr.Rajeev Sharma,Advocate Mr. Gautam Jha,Advocate Mr. Nachiketa Joshi,Advocate Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate
Mr. Merusagar Samantaray,Advocate
Mr. Nishant R.Katneshwarkar, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
2