The Director General (Vig) And Cvo vs. State Through The Inspector Of Police
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
° ITEM NO.23 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION I I S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. PAWAN DEV KOTWAL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5838/20 14 MANJU SURANA Petitioner( s) VERSUS SUNIL ARORA AND ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for deletion of the name of respondent and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1092/2015 (With Office Report) Date : 29/02/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Siddhartha Jha, Adv. Mr. Gautam Jha,Adv. Mr. Merusagar Samantaray,Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Sharma,Adv. Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Jain,Adv. Mr. H.D. Thanvi, Adv. Mr. Rishi Matoliya, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is granted to the learned Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1,2,3,5,6, and 8 to file the counter affidavit. None appears for Respondent No. 7 despite due service. The time granted as last opportunity for filing c ounter affidavit to the Respondent No. 1 has not expired as per order dated 09.02.2016 of this Court. As such he is at liberty to file the same within the granted time period. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2016.03.01 17:04:13 IST Reason: ...contd . 2/- -2- Respondent No. 2 has already filed the counter affidavit. Four weeks time is granted to the learned Counsel for Respondent No. 3 to file the counter affidavit. List again on 09.05.2016.
(PAWAN DEV KOTWAL) Registrar