The Director General (Vig) And Cvo vs. State Through The Inspector Of Police
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.1 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 5838/2014
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/04/2014 in SBCRP No. 341/2014 passed by the High Court Of Rajasthan at Jaipur)
MANJU SURANA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SUNIL ARORA AND ORS Respondent(s)
(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and office report)
Date : 19/09/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
R-1 Mr. Merusagar Smantaray, Adv.
R-3 Mr. Gautam Jha, Adv.
R-5 Mr. Nishant Katneshwarkar, Adv.
R-8 Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
According to the Office Report, service is incomplete.
Advocate-on-record for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for service on the unserved respondents, returnable in ten weeks.
Dasti, in addition to the ordinary process, is permitted.
(PARDEEP KUMAR) AR-cum-PS
(RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER