Rangorath Gokul Prasad vs. The State Of Kerala Thr. Chief Secretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:13 Apr 2018
CNR:SCIN010050792018

AI Summary

The Supreme Court has taken cognizance of a Writ Petition filed by Rangorath Gokul Prasad against the State of Kerala and other key institutions. This initial order directs the issuance of notice to the respondents and mandates that the case be heard along with a connected matter, setting the stage for significant legal proceedings in a matter likely concerning medical education or state policy.

Ratio Decidendi:
This procedural order does not contain a ratio decidendi as it does not lay down any legal principle but merely directs administrative steps for the progression of the case.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:178/2018
Case Type:Writ Petition (Civil)
Case Sub-Type:Writ Petition - Medical Education Policy
Secondary Case Numbers:5079/2018
Order Date:2018-04-13
Filing Year:2018
Court:Supreme Court of India
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Uday Umesh Lalit

Petitioner's Counsel

Raghvendra S. Srivastava
Advocate - Appeared
Anish R. Shah
Advocate-on-Record - Appeared
Amit A. Pai
Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Anish R. Shah

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

Rangorath Gokul Prasad filed a Writ Petition (Civil) against the State of Kerala and other respondents. The Supreme Court heard the petition on April 13, 2018, and issued notice to all respondents. The court also directed that this petition be tagged with another related matter, W.P.(C)No.231/2018, for further proceedings, and a copy of the petition be provided to the standing counsel for the State.

Timeline of Events

2018-02-08

Filing of the case (as per JSON Filing Date)

2018-02-24

Registration of the Writ Petition (as per JSON Registration Date)

2018-04-13

Hearing of the petition by the Supreme Court; notice issued and case tagged with W.P.(C)No.231/2018.

Key Factual Findings

Notice is required to be issued to the respondents.

Source: Current Court Finding

The present case shares commonality with W.P.(C)No.231/2018, necessitating tagging.

Source: Current Court Finding

The State of Kerala requires a copy of the petition for their standing counsel.

Source: Current Court Finding

Primary Legal Issues

1.Issuance of notice to respondents in a Writ Petition
2.Tagging of connected matters for consolidated hearing

Petitioner's Arguments

The petitioner's counsel appeared before the court, likely presenting the grounds for the Writ Petition and seeking the court's intervention, leading to the direction for issuing notice.

Respondent's Arguments

No arguments were presented by the respondent's side at this stage, as the court directed the issuance of notice to them.

Court's Reasoning

The Supreme Court, upon initial hearing, deemed it necessary to involve all listed respondents by issuing notice and to ensure judicial efficiency by tagging the matter with a connected case (W.P.(C)No.231/2018) for joint consideration, indicating that the petition raised issues warranting a response from the State and other authorities.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Emphasis on procedural fairness by ensuring notice to all parties
  • Judicial efficiency through tagging of similar matters
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Pending

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Issue notice.
  2. 2.Tag with W.P.(C)No.231/2018.
  3. 3.A copy of the petition be furnished to the standing counsel for the State.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This order is purely procedural, directing notice and tagging. It does not establish any new legal principles or interpret existing law in a manner that would serve as a binding or persuasive precedent.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Always ensure proper service of notice to all necessary respondents as per court directions.
2.Be aware of connected matters in court, as cases may be tagged for joint hearing to streamline adjudication.
3.A copy of the petition must be furnished to the standing counsel for the State when the State is a respondent.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court Writ Petition Procedural OrderNotice Issuance to Respondents DirectionsCase Tagging for Consolidated HearingAdvocate on Record Appearance GuidelinesInterim Directions in Constitutional Petition

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

24 Feb 2018

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition (Civil) No(s).178/2018

RANGORATH GOKUL PRASAD Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for stay)

Date : 13-04-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Raghvendra S. Srivastava,Adv. Mr. Anish R. Shah,AOR Mr. Amit A. Pai,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Issue notice.

Tag with W.P.(C)No.231/2018.

A copy of the petition be furnished to the standing counsel for the State.

(Sarita Purohit) (Jagdish Chander) Court master Branch Officer

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(9) - 9 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 8 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 7 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 2 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 30 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 27 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 23 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 May 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 13 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing