Suresh Kumar Jain vs. Madanlal Jain Dead By Lr

ITEM NO.4 Virtual Court 2 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) ……………..Diary No(s).5046/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and orders dated 30-07- 2018 in GA No.862/2016 with APO 202 of 2017 in EC No.873 of 2015 and 08-11-2019 in GA No.2244/2018 in R.V.W.O.24 of 2018 arising out of GA No.862 of 2016 in APO No.202 of 2017 arising out of E.C.No.873 of 2015 passed by the High Court at Calcutta)

SURESH KUMAR JAIN & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MADANLAL JAIN DEAD BY LR & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45120/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.45122/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 08-06-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

• For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. Mr. Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Adv. Ms. Rashi Bansal, AOR Mr. Gagan Kataria, Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Mr. K.K.Sharma, Sr.Adv. Mr. Vikas Sethi, Adv. Mr. Harsh Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Roshan Santhalia, AOR
• Mr. Rajeev Kumar Jain, Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

Delay condoned.

These petitions are directed against orders dated 30.07.2018 and 08.11.2019 passed by the Calcutta High Court whereby the High Court dismissed the review petition of the petitioners herein on the basis that the first order passed by it was a consent order.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perusing the record, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the High Court.

However, taking into consideration the fact that EC No.144/2016 and E.C.No.873/2015 are pending consideration before the learned Single Judge of the High Court, we request the High Court to dispose of the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

We grant liberty to the petitioners to raise all objections before the High Court at the time of hearing of the matter.

With the aforesaid request, the special leave petitions stand disposed of.

As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (RAJ RANI NEGI)

AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR