In Re:Imp & Wkg Of Con Protection Act, 86 vs. Uoi & Others

Ê' SLP(C)No. 6928 OF 1999 ITEM No. 1 Court No. 3 SECTION XI & PIL

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 6928/1999

(From the judgement and order dated 08/10/1998 in CMWP 968/97 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD)

STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Petitioner (s)

VERSUS

JEET S. BISHT & ANR. Respondent (s)

(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T. & appln. for taking affidavit on record and for i ntervention/impleadment as respondent, directions, for acceptinG suppl. Affidavit and with pra yer for interim relief)

(ALONGWITH THE RECORD OF SLP (C) NO. 4135/2002 AND WP (C) NO. 164/2002) WITH WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 164/2002 "IN RE: THE IMPLEMENTATION AND THE WORKING OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986" (With appln. for taking additional document on record, directions, permission to submit additi onal documents, amendment of the petition, exemption from filing English translation of Hindi version and impleadment)

Date : 09/03/2004 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. LAHOTI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN

For Petitioner (s) in SLP 6928/99 Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Adv.

For N.C.D.R.C. Bar AssociationMr. M.N. Krishnamani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ranji Thomas, Adv. Ms. Bharti Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv.

For Applicant (s) in SLPMs. Sandhya Goswami, Adv. Mr. N.S. Bisht, Adv. Ms. C.K. Sucharita, Adv. in WPMs. Shobha Dixit, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Sharma, Adv. Mr. T. Mahipal, Adv. For Respondent (s) Union of IndiaMr. K.C. Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das, Adv.

State of A.P.Mr. T.V. Ratnam, Adv. Mr. K. Subba Rao, Adv. State of AssamMs. Krishna Sarma, Adv. Mr. Sanjay C.V. Choudhary, Adv. Mr. V.K. Siddharthan, Adv. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Adv. For M/s Corporate law Group, Advs. State of Arunachal PradeshMr. Anil Shrivastav, Adv. State of BiharMr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. Mr. B.B. Singh, Adv. State of ChhatisgarhMr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Suparna Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Prakash Shrivastava, Adv. State of GoaMs. A. Subhashini, Adv. State of Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. State of HaryanaMr. Satinder Singh Gulati, Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia, Adv. For Mr. J.P. Dhanda, Adv. State of Himachal PradeshMr. J.S. Attri, Adv. State of J & KMr. Anis Suhrawardy, Adv. State of JharkhandMr. Prem Prakash, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. State of KarnatakaMr. Sanjay R. Hegde, Adv. State of KeralaMr. K.R. Sasiprabhu, Adv. State of M.P.Mr. Sakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, Adv. State of MaharashtraMr. S.S. Shinde, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. State of ManipurMr. KH. Nobin Singh, Adv. State of MeghalayaMr. Ranjan Mukherjee, Adv. State of MizoramMs. Sumita Hazarika, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. State of NagalandMr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay K. Shandilya, Adv. Ms. V.D. Khanna, Adv. State of OrissaMr. Janaranjan Das, Adv. Mr. Swetaketu Mishra, Adv. For Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, Adv. State of PunjabMr. R.K. Rathore, Addl. Adv. Genl. Mr. R.S. Suri, Adv. For Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. State of RajasthanMr. Aruneshwar Gupta, Addl. Adv. Genl. Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv. For Mr. Javed Mahmud Rao, Adv. State of SikkimMr. B.S. Chahar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, Adv. State of Tamil NaduMr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr. Gopalakrishnan R., Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar, Adv. For Ms. Revathy Raghavan, Adv. State of TripuraMr. Gopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Anurag Sharma, Adv. State of UttaranchalMs. Rachna Srivastava, Adv. State of U.P.Mr. Jatin Zaveri, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. State of West BengalMr. Tara Chandra Sharma, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Tarun Sharma, Adv. Union Territories of Andaman & Nicobar, Dadra & Nagar Haveli, Daman & Diu and Lakshadweep Mr. K.C. Kaushik, Adv. Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. R.K. Rathore, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. U.T. Of PondicherryMr. R. Mohan, Sr. Adv. Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv. Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R IA Nos. 7 & 8 in W.P. On a prayer made by the learned counsel for the Union of India, adjourned by four weeks. Resp onse must be filed positively within this time. IA No. 8 in SLP The learned counsel for the State of U.P. Seeks time for filing a better affidavit in response . Let it be done within three weeks. List all the pending applications in both the matters after four weeks. KALYANI (PROMILA NAGPAL) COURT MASTER