Jabarullakhan vs. Lucas (Dead) Through Lrs

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:21 Apr 2025
CNR:SCIN010049662019

AI Summary

In a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, a key procedural hurdle emerged with the passing of respondent Lucas, necessitating the substitution of his legal heirs. This order grants the petitioner's counsel four weeks to facilitate the appearance of these new parties and file a counter affidavit, ensuring the continuation of a case with significant implications for the litigants involved, which was originally filed in 2019 and challenges 2018 High Court orders.

Ratio Decidendi:
When a party to a Special Leave Petition passes away, the Court may, in its discretion and in the interest of justice, grant the counsel for the remaining parties reasonable opportunity and time (e.g., four weeks) to ensure the appearance of the deceased's legal representatives and to file necessary affidavits, thereby facilitating the proper constitution and continuation of the legal proceedings.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:Special Leave Petition (C) No(s). 4475-4476/2019
Case Type:Special Leave Petition (C)
Case Sub-Type:SLP - Substitution & Abatement Application
Secondary Case Numbers:SCIN010049662019, 4966/2019
Order Date:2025-01-10
Filing Year:2019
Court:Supreme Court Of India
Bench:Single Judge in Chambers
Judges:Hon'ble Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh

Petitioner's Counsel

K. K. Mani
Advocate on Record - Appeared
T.archana
Advocate - Appeared
Rajeev Gupta
Advocate - Appeared

Respondent's Counsel

A Velan
Advocate on Record - Appeared

Advocates on Record

K. K. Mani
A Velan

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

This Special Leave Petition (Civil) involves Jabarullakhan as the petitioner against Lucas (now deceased) as the primary respondent. The case is currently at a procedural juncture where Interlocutory Applications concerning abatement, substitution of legal heirs, and condonation of delay in filing the substitution application are pending. On January 10, 2025, the Supreme Court, in Chambers presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, granted the petitioner's counsel four weeks to ensure the appearance of the deceased respondent's legal representatives and to file a counter affidavit.

Timeline of Events

2016

Original cases (CRPMD) filed in Tamil Nadu High Court.

2018-09-25

Tamil Nadu High Court issues orders in CRPMD-1401-2016 and CRPMD-1402-2016, which are challenged in the SLP.

2019-02-07

Special Leave Petition (C) No(s). 4475-4476/2019 filed in the Supreme Court.

2019-02-18

First hearing of the Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court.

2021-03-10

Interlocutory Applications filed for abatement, substitution, and condonation of delay in substitution of the deceased respondent Lucas.

2025-01-10

Supreme Court grants petitioner's counsel four weeks to ensure appearance of legal representatives and file counter affidavit.

Key Factual Findings

The respondent Lucas is deceased, necessitating applications for substitution and abatement.

Source: Recited from Petitioner Pleading

The petitioner's counsel sought and was granted an additional four weeks to ensure appearance of the legal representatives and to file a counter affidavit.

Source: Current Court Finding

Primary Legal Issues

1.Procedure for substitution of legal heirs upon the death of a party.
2.Condonation of delay in filing substitution applications.
3.Application for abatement of proceedings.

Secondary Legal Issues

1.Ensuring appearance of substituted parties.
2.Filing of necessary affidavits in a Special Leave Petition.

Petitioner's Arguments

The petitioner's counsel requested an extension of four weeks to facilitate the appearance of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent, Lucas, and to file a counter affidavit, presumably in response to the pending Interlocutory Applications or for the main Special Leave Petition.

Respondent's Arguments

The order does not explicitly detail arguments from the respondent's side; their counsel was present but no specific submissions are recorded regarding the application for time.

Court's Reasoning

The Court granted the petitioner's request for more time, implicitly reasoning that such an extension is necessary and in the interest of justice to ensure proper procedural compliance, allow all necessary parties to come on record, and enable the filing of relevant documents before the substantive matter can proceed effectively.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Emphasis on Procedural Fairness
  • Efficiency in Case Management
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Pending

Impugned Orders

High Court of Tamil Nadu
Case: CRPMD-1401-2016, CRPMD-1402-2016
Date: 2018-09-25

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted another opportunity of four weeks to enter appearance and for filing counter affidavit.
  2. 2.List the matter after four weeks.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This is a routine procedural order granting time, specific to the facts of the case, and does not establish a new legal principle or interpret law. Its value is limited to the specific parties involved.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Promptly address the death of parties by filing necessary substitution/abatement applications and ensuring the appearance of legal representatives to avoid delays in litigation.
2.Ensure all procedural steps, such as filing counter affidavits, are completed within the stipulated time frames granted by the court, particularly when dealing with party changes.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court procedural order substitution legal heirsSpecial Leave Petition abatement application condonation delayCivil Procedure Code Order XXII Indian courtsAdvocate on Record duties appearance filing affidavitCase management strategies in appellate courts India

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Administrative Order

Before:

Registrar

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Remarks:

List After (Weeks) [4], List before court/bench

Listed On:

21 Apr 2025

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.1712 COURT NO.3 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Special Leave Petition (C) No(s). 4475-4476/2019

JABARULLAKHAN Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

LUCAS (DEAD) Respondent(s)

IA No. 37185/2021 - APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT IA No. 37179/2021 - APPLICATION FOR SUBSTITUTION IA No. 37183/2021 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.) Date : 10-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. K. Mani, AOR Ms. T.archana, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A Velan, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted another opportunity of four weeks to enter appearance and for filing counter affidavit.

List the matter after four weeks.

(KANCHAN CHOUHAN) (MAMTA RANI) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(6) - 21 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(5) - 27 Mar 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 10 Jan 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 24 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 30 Oct 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 18 Feb 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view