Arelli Datta Bhosle vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Now Telangana Through Home Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble B.R. Gavai, Hon'ble Vikram Nath
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed on ground of delay [and merits]
Listed On:
13 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.32 COURT NO.8 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 4898/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-03-2013 in CRLA No. 103/2010 passed by the High Court Of A.p. At Hyderabad)
ARELLI DATTA BHOSLE Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH NOW TELANGANA THROUGH HOME SECRETARY Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42315/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.42317/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.43135/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
WITH
Diary No(s). 4897/2023 (II)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.42903/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.42906/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.42909/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 13-03-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. A Sirajudeen, Sr. Adv. Ms. Manjeet Chawla, AOR Mr. Keethik Vasan, Adv. Mrs. Usha Pant Kukreti, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
There is an inordinate delay of 3524 and 5488 days in filing these petitions respectively for which no satisfactory explanation has been furnished and moreover Digitally signed by Deepak Singh Date: 2023.03.13 18:31:46 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. Consequently, the special leave petitions stand dismissed both on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
However, in case the petitioners apply for premature release, the same would decided in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (ANJU KAPOOR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)