S. L Oza vs. The State Of Gujarat

The respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The respondent No.2 has already filed the counter affidavit as gets revealed from the perusal of the office report. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.02.28 13:10:35 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

for permission to place addl. documents on record and Interim Relief and Office Report)

Date : 27/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

WITH SLP(C) No. 7663/2014 SLP(C) No. 3475/2015 SLP(C) No. 2926/2015 (With appln.(s) for permission to bring addl. facts and appln.(s)

relief and office report)

(with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent and interim

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7662/2014

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

S.L OZA & ORS Petitioner(s)

…........2

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Pradeep Misra,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rashmikumar Manilal Vithlani,Adv.

SLP(C) No.7662/2014

O R D E R

VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS(R. 2) Respondent(s)

Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready. SLP(C) No.7663/2014

Ld.counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has already complied with the terms of the office report. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly.

SLP(C) No.2926 & 3475/2015

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to all the respondents.

List again on 08.05.2015.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB