S. L Oza vs. The State Of Gujarat

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble M.R. Shah
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Nov 2015
CNR:SCIN010046762014

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

10 Mar 2014

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

SECTION-XV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO.7662/2014 & 7663/2014 WITH SLP(C) NO. 2926/2015, 3475/2015 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF

S.L OZA & ORS. ETC. ETC. PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. & ETC. ETC. RESPONDENT(S)

OFFICE REPORT

The matters above-mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 27.02.2015, when the Court was pleased to pass the following inter-alia order:

"SLP(C) NO.7662/2014.

The respondent No. 1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. The respondent No. 2 has already filed the counter affidavit as gets revealed from the perusal of the office report. Service of notice is complete on the other respondents, but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.

Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as and when the connected ones get ready.

"SLP(C) NO.7663/2014.

Ld. counsel for the petitioners has stated that he has already complied with the terms of the office report. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly.

"SLP(C) NO.2926 & 3475/2015.

Await the return of the service of notice already issued to all the respondents.

List again on 08.05.2015"

SLP(C) NO.7662/2014.

It is submitted that there are 12 respondents. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Counsel for the respondent No. 2 has already filed counter affidavit. Rest of respondents i.e. 3 to 12 have been served but no one has entered appearance so far.

Service is complete.

SLP(C) NO.7663/2014.

It is further submitted that there are 20 respondents. Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Counsel for the respondent No. 2 has already filed counter affidavit. Rest of the respondents i.e. 3 to 4, 6 to 8, 10 to 18 & 20 have been served but no one has entered appearance so far. Name of respondent Nos. 5, 9 and 19 have been deleted from the array of parties vide court's order dated 17.09.2015.

Service is complete.

SLP(C) NOS.2926/2015 & 3475/2015

(Copy of Record of Proceeding dated 27.08.2015 is enclosed)

SLP(C) NOS.2926/2015

It is submitted that there are respondent Nos. 1-4 in this matter. Mr. R. M. Vithlani, Advocate for the petitioner has not filed application for bringing on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner No. 1. Mr. Pradeep Misra, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Neither AD card nor unserved cover have been received from respondent Nos. 2-4 and none has entered appearance on their behalf.

Service is incomplete on respondent No. 2-4.

SLP(C) NO.3475/2015

It is submitted that there are two respondents in this matter. Mr. R. M. Vithlani, Advocate has filed an application for bring on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner No. 1, which has been filed within time but is not accompanied by vakalatnama. The Advocate has been informed in this regard vide Registry's letter dated 16.11.2015. Mr. Pradeep Misra, Advocate for the respondent No. 1 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Neither AD card nor unserved cover have been received from respondent Nos. 2 and none has entered appearance on his behalf.

Service is incomplete on respondent No. 2.

The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this Office Report.

Dated this the 19th day of November, 2015.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to: Mr. R. M. Vithlani, Adv. Mr. Pradeep Misra, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(35) - 3 Dec 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(34) - 12 Nov 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 19 Apr 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(32) - 24 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(29) - 18 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(30) - 18 Nov 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(31) - 18 Nov 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 16 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 16 Mar 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(28) - 16 Mar 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(23) - 2 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(24) - 2 Feb 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(25) - 2 Feb 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(20) - 20 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 20 Nov 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(22) - 20 Nov 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 17 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 17 Sept 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(19) - 17 Sept 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 27 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(15) - 27 Aug 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(16) - 27 Aug 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(12) - 8 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(13) - 8 May 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(10) - 27 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 27 Feb 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 6 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Feb 2015

Office Report

Click to view

Order(9) - 6 Feb 2015

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 15 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 15 Dec 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 10 Nov 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 22 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 22 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 10 Mar 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Search in District Courts Data