Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd vs. Pba Infrastructure Ltd

SLP(C)No.20224/16 etc. 1

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).20224/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-06-2016 in CSN No.66/2016 in EA No.2748/2015 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)

ARUP DEB ANDORS. & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GLOBAL ASIA VENTURE COMPANY Respondent(s)

(and IA No.101137/2017-XTRA (I.A. FOR URGENT DIRECTIONS))

WITH SLP(C) Nos.19545-19546/2016 (IX)

SLP(C) No.5021/2017 (IX)

SLP(C) Nos.9599-9600/2017 (XIV)

Date : 13-10-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

For Petitioner(s) Mr.K.V.Vishvanathan, Sr.Adv. Mr.Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Mrs.Bihu Sharma, Adv. Ms.Purnima Krishna, Adv. Mr.Siddharth Garg, Adv.

Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. Mr.Prateek Kumar, Adv. Mr.Anushka Sharda, Adv. Mr.Raj Panchmati, Adv. Mr.Suksham Chauhan, Adv. Mr.Sanjeev K.Kapoor, Adv.

Mr.Ali Reja Osmani, Adv. Mr.Aditya Awasthi, Adv. Ms.Aastha Dhawan, Adv.

Mr.Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Ms.Aastha Dhawan, Adv. Ms.Neha Sangwan, Adv.

Mr.D.S.K. Legal, AOR M/s Khaitan & Co., AOR For Respondent(s) Mr.Nakul Dewan, Adv. Mr.Pradhuman Gohil, Adv. Ms.Taruna Singh, Adv. Mr.Himanshu Chaubey, Adv. Ms.Neela Mohan, Adv. Ms.Ishita Singh, Adv. Mr.Chirag M. Shroff, AOR Ms.Neha Sangwan, Adv. Mr.Sanjay Bansal, Adv. Mr.G. K. Bansal, AOR Ms.Liz Mathew, AOR Mr.Braj Kishore Mishra, AOR Ms.Vaishnavi Subrahmanyam, Adv. Mr.Balaji Srinivasan, AOR Mr.Abhishek Bharti, Adv. Ms.Pratiksha Mishra, Adv. Mr.Ankul Saigal, Adv. Ms. Shally Bhasin, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

I.A.No.101137/2017

Let the matter be listed for final disposal on 21.11.2017.

In the meantime, the petitioners shall not alienate any assets. Needless to say, apart from this, they can carry out the normal business transactions.

In view of the above, the execution proceedings shall remain in abeyance.

Let the matter be listed along with other connected matters.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (H.S. PARASHER)

AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR