Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd vs. Pba Infrastructure Ltd

ITEM NO.33 COURT NO.4 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20224/2016

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14/06/2016 in EA No. 2748/2015 14/06/2016 in CSN No. 66/2016 passed by the High Court of Bombay)

ARUP DEB AND ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GLOBAL ASIA VENTURE COMPANY Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief and office report)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 19545-19546/2016 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and )

Date : 26/08/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

	For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv.
		Mr. Prateek Kumar, Adv.
		Ms. Anusha Sharda, Adv.
		Mr. Suksham Chauhan, Adv.
		Mr. Sanjeev K. Kapoor, Adv.
	For	M/s. Khaitan & Co.
		Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. Adv.
		Mr. K.V. Vishvanathan, Sr. Adv.
		Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR
		Ms. Bihu Sharma, Adv.
		Ms. Purnima Krishna, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. A. Sood, Adv. Mr. Adhip Iyer, Adv. Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR Mr. Rohan R., Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP (C) Nos.19545-19546 of 2016

Issue notice.

As the respondent has been represented by Mr. Chidambaram, learned senior counsel being assisted by Ms. Liz Mathew, learned counsel, no further notice need be issued.

Learned counsel for the parties fairly stated that the controversy centres around interpretation of Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 and certain other provisions of the said Act. In view of the aforesaid, no counter affidavit or rejoinder affidavit is necessary.

Let the matter be listed on 8.9.2016. As agreed to by learned counsel for the parties, it shall be taken up at 2.00 p.m.

Learned counsel for the parties shall submit their written notes of submission at the commencement of hearing.

SLP (C) No.20224 of 2016

Let a copy of the petition be served on the learned counsel for the respondent who appeared before the High Court.

List on 8.9.2016.

(Gulshan Kumar Arora) (Shakti Parkash Sharma) Court Master Court Master