The State Of Haryana State Of Haryana Chief Secretary vs. Gajey Singh Muwal (Dead) Thr. Lrs

\f	IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
	CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
	CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2317 OF 2011
	STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.									Appellan
t(s)
						VERSUS
nt(s)	DAVINDER SINGH & ORS.									Responde
					O	R	D	E	R
ent(s)		Learned			counsel			for	the	respond
Bench	heavily		relies		upon			the	Constitution
Vs.	decision of this Court in<br>E.V. Chinnaiah
	State of A.P. and others1.
tional	2.	On	the		other		hand,		learned	Addi
	Solicitor General for the appellants, submits that
on<br>the	E.V.		Chinnaiah1		has		no		application
that	controversy			in	hand.		Moreover,		he	submits
	E.V. Chinnaiah1 is not in accord with the 9-Judge
	Bench decision of this Court in Indra Sawhney and
	others<br>Vs. Union of India and others2.
olicitor	3.	Having		heard		learned			Additional	S
	General and learned counsel for the parties, we
Signature Not Verified	are of the view that								E.V. Chinnaiah1 needs to be
Digitally signed by<br>Rajesh Dham<br>Date: 2014.08.23<br>11:59:54 IST<br>of<br>the<br>Reason:	revisited		in		light		of		Article	338
ion	Constitution of India and, inter<br>1<br>2<br>:2:		(2005) 1 SCC 394<br>1992 Supp (3) SCC 217							alia, exposit

of law in Indra Sawhney2.

4. Moreover, the matter also involves interpretation and interplay between Article 16(1), Article 16(4), Article 338 and Article 341 of the Constitution of India as well. 5. In this view of the matter, we refer the matter for consideration of the above aspects by the larger Bench. 6. Let the matter be placed before the Chief Justice on administrative side for appropriate order. ........................CJI. (R.M. LODHA) ..........................J. (KURIAN JOSEPH) NEW DELHI; ..........................J. AUGUST 20, 2014 (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5586 OF 2010 HARYANA DHANAK SEWA SAMITI Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5589 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5597 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5593 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5598 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5600 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5595-5596 OF 2010 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5587 OF 2010 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 30766 OF 2010 TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 37 OF 2011 TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 38 OF 2011

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2318 OF 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2324 OF 2011 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 5454-5459 OF 2011 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8701 OF 2011 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 36500-36501 OF 2011 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2014 O R D E R Learned senior counsel and learned counsel for the parties submit that the issues involved in :2: these matters are identical with the issues involved in Civil Appeal No. 2317 of 2011. 2. In terms of the separate order passed by us today in Civil Appeal No. 2317 of 2011 referring the matter for consideration by the larger Bench, these matters also need to be referred to the larger Bench for consideration of constitutional questions noted in that order. We order accordingly. 3. Let these matters be placed before the Chief Justice on administrative side for appropriate order. ........................CJI. (R.M. LODHA) ..........................J. (KURIAN JOSEPH)

NEW DELHI; ..........................J. AUGUST 20, 2014 (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN) :1: ITEM NOS.101 + 121 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5586/2010 HARYANA DHANAK SEWA SAMITI Appellant(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for impleadment as party respondent and impleadment as party respondent and impleadment as party respondent and substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and exemption from filing O.T. and office report)

WITH

C.A. No. 5589/2010 (With appln.(s) for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln and exemption from filing O.T. and impleadment as party respondent)

• C.A. No. 5597/2010 (With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln and exemption from filing O.T.)
• C.A. No. 5593/2010 (With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln and exemption from filing O.T.)
• C.A. No. 5598/2010 (With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and substitution and exemption from filing O.T.)
• C.A. No. 5600/2010 (With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and office report)
• C.A. No. 5595-5596/2010
• C.A. No. 5587/2010 (With appln.(s) for impleadment as party respondent and substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln and exemption from filing O.T.) :2:
• C.A. No. 2317/2011 (with appln.(s) for early hearing and impleadment and intervention and vacating stay and office report)
• SLP(C) No. 30766/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
• T.C.(C) No. 37/2011
• T.C.(C) No. 38/2011
• C.A. No. 2318/2011 (With Office Report)
• C.A. No. 2324/2011 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and intervention)
• SLP(C) No. 5454-5459/2011 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief)
• SLP(C) No. 8701/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
• SLP(C) No. 36500-36501/2011 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and c/delay in refiling SLP and Interim Relief and Office Report)

C.A. No. 289/2014 (With Office Report) Date : 20/08/2014 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN For Appellant(s) Mr. L. Nageswara Rao, A.S.G. Mr. Ajay Bansal, A.A.G. Mr. Gourav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Gurbachan Singh, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv. Mr. Shivraj Gaonkar, Adv. Mr. Nayank Pandey, Adv. Mr. B. K. Satija ,Adv. :3: Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg ,Adv. Mr. Neeraj Kr. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv. Mr. Shodhan Babu, Adv. Mr. Yashraj Bundela, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vinay Kumar Garg ,Adv. Ms. Seema Rao, Adv. Mr. Mohit Nagar, Adv. Ms. Shefali Jain, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. P.N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Manjit Singh, A.A.G. Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv. Mr. R. D. Upadhyay ,Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh ,Adv. Mr. Manoj Swarup, Adv. Mr. Karan Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh ,Adv. Ms. Roopa Paul, Adv. Mr. S.C. Paul, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Ajay Pal ,Adv. Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh ,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. A. Subba Rao, Adv. Ms. Niranjana Singh ,Adv.

Mr. Ram Bhaj, Adv. Mr. L. Nageswara Rao, A.S.G. Mr. Ajay Bansal, A.A.G. Mr. Gourav Yadav, Adv. Mr. Kuldip Singh, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra ,Adv. :4: Mr. Manjit Singh, A.A.G. Ms. Vivekta Singh, Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta ,Adv. Dr. K.S. Chauhan, Adv. Mr. P. K. Jayakrishnan ,Adv. Mr. Ajit K. Ekka, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash, Adv. Mr. S.C. Paul, Adv. Ms. Roopa Paul, Adv. Ms. Rekha Pandey ,Adv. Mr. Brij Bhusan, Adv. Mr. Shiv Pujan Singh, Adv. Mr. Parmanand Pandey ,Adv. Mr. S.C. Paul, Adv. Mr. Resham Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. S.C. Paul, Adv. Ms. Roopa Paul, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Resham Singh, Adv. Mr. Satyendra Kumar ,Adv. Ms. Naresh Bakshi ,Adv. Ms. S. Janani ,Adv. M/s. Mahalakshmi Balaji & Co. Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar ,Adv. Mr. B.P. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar Jai ,Adv. Mr. P. Soma Sundaram ,Adv. Mr. Tushar Bakshi ,Adv. :5: Mr. Debasis Misra ,Adv.

Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Adv. Mr. R.V. Kameshwaran, Adv.

Mr. Prabhash Kr. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Bankey Bihari Sharma ,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2317 OF 2011

In terms of the signed order, the matter is

referred to the larger Bench.

Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on administrative side for appropriate order.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5586 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5589 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5597 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5593 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5598 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5600 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5595-5596 OF 2010; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5587 OF 2010; SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 30766 OF 2010; TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 37 OF 2011; TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO. 38 OF 2011; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2318 OF 2011; CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2324 OF 2011; SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 5454-5459 OF 2011; SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 8701 OF 2011; SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NOS. 36500-36501 OF 2011 AND CIVIL APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2014

In	terms	of	the	separate	order	passed	today	in
Civil	Appeal	No.	2317<br>:6:	of		2011 referring the matter to

the larger Bench, these matters are also referred to the

larger Bench as per signed order.

Let these matters be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on administrative side for appropriate order.

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

(RAJESH DHAM) (RENU DIWAN)

(two signed orders are placed on the file)