ITEM NO.39 COURT NO.4 SECTION IV-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).2899-2900/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-12-2022 in WP No.105360/2021 and WP No.102083/2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka Circuit Bench at Dharwad)

ASHISH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ARPITA Respondent(s)

IA No.27198/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No.27199/2023 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES WITH SLP(C) No. 2732/2023 (IV-A) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 25715/2023 IA No. 25715/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) T.P.(Crl.) No. 131/2023 (II-C) IA No. 43788/2023 - EX-PARTE STAY IA No. 150887/2023 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON) Date : 16-02-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.V. VISWANATHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, AOR Mr. Akshay Gupta, Adv. Ms. Ananya Sahu, Adv. Mr. Ananya Sahu, Adv. Mr. Deepesh Singh, Adv. Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv. Ms. Priya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sushant Singhal, Adv. Ms. Anu Priya Nisha Minz, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Fartiyal, Adv. Mr. Nring Chamwibo Zeliang, Adv. Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv. Ms. Anupama Kaul, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Thakur, Adv. Mr. S. S. Jauhar, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajesh Gulab Inamdar, AOR Mr. Mohd Arsalan Muin, Adv.

Respondent-in-person

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C)Nos.2899-2900/2023 and SLP(C)No.2732/2023

1. Pursuant to the order dated 17.04.2023, and as jointly prayed by counsel for the parties, these matters are referred to the Supreme Court Mediation Centre to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement of the dispute.

2. The parties are, accordingly, directed to appear before the Supreme Court Mediation Centre on 01.03.2024 at 12.00 Noon.

3. The parties shall extend full cooperation to the learned Mediator.

4. List immediately after receipt of a report from the learned Mediator.

T.P.(Crl.) No.131/2023

1. The application for permission to appear and argue in person is allowed.

2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 states that as per the instructions received from his client, the complaint case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, has been withdrawn, and as such, this Transfer Petition has become infructuous.

3. The Transfer Petition is, accordingly, disposed of as having become infructuous.

4. As a result, the pending interlocutory application also stands disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

2