State Of Rajashtan vs. Asharam

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1181 of 2006 MULYA AND ANR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.542 OF 2007 STATE OF RAJASTHAN Appellant(s) VERSUS ASHARAM & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1181 OF 2006: We have heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the record. We do not see any ground to interfere with the conviction of the appellants. However, having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we reduce the sentence awarded to the appellants to the period already undergone by them. The appellants are on bail. Their bail bonds stand discharged. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.542 OF 2007: Heard. We do do see any ground to interfere with the impugned 2 order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand dispose of. ..........................J. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) ..........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) New Delhi, February 21, 2017. 3 ITEM NO.120 COURT NO.13 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Criminal Appeal No(s). 1181/2006 MULYA AND ANR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondent(s) WITH Criminal Appeal NO.542/2007 (With Office Report) Date : 21/02/2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Appellant(s) Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. (Crl.A. 1181/2006) Ms. Sushma Verma,Adv. (Crl.A. 542/2007) Mr. S.S. Shamshery,AAG Mr. Amit Sharma,Adv. Mr. Ankit Raj,Adv. Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Rohit K. Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In terms of the signed order, Crl.A. No.1181 of 2006 is disposed of and Crl.A. No.542 of 2007 is dismissed. (MAHABIR SINGH) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed order is placed on the file)

1