Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir vs. Sajad Ahmad Malik
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
6 Sept 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.14 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 4286/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-11-2020 in LPASW No. 39/2019 passed by the High Court Of Jammu&kashmir At Srinagar)
STATE (NOW UT) OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ULFAT ARA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.36339/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.36344/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT)
Date : 17-09-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH
For Petitioner(s) Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR Mr. Parth Awasthi, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Firdouse Qutb Wani, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Applications for exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing affidavit are allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the impugned judgment would amount to giving regularization even where no vacancy exists. She submits that judgment in Rabia Shah vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. has been distinguished in
the case of Suhail Maqbool Dar vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors**.,(Srinagar Bench), SWP No. 2127/2016, even though the special leave petition in Rabia Shah's case (supra) was dismissed.**
Issue notice.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.39 accepts notice. Remaining respondents be served dasti as well.
In the meantime, we direct that the regularization would take effect in terms of the impugned judgment for the existing vacancies. The effect is that if sufficient number of vacancies exists, all the respondents will be beneficiaries but if there is a deficiency of vacancies, then such of the respondents who by seniority would be entitled as per the existing vacancies would get the benefit, and others would get the benefit from the date the vacancy arose. The result is that regularization will take place from the date of the corresponding vacancies.
Tag with SLP(Civil) No. 8720/2021.
[CHARANJEET KAUR] | [POONAM VAID] |
---|---|
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS | COURT MASTER (NSH) |
2