Union Territory Of Jammu And Kashmir vs. Sajad Ahmad Malik

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M. Sundresh
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:6 Sept 2021
CNR:SCIN010044062021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

6 Sept 2021

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 8720/2021 in LPA No. 148/2020 passed by the High Court Of Jammu&kashmir At Srinagar) STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MOHAMMAD SYED PARREY & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.76455/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ) Date : 13-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Ms. Taruna Ardhendumauli Prasad, AOR Mr. Parth Awasthi, Adv. For Respondent(s) For R-15 Ms. Firdouse Qutb Wani, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Application for permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures are allowed.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the impugned judgment would amount to giving regularization even where no vacancy exists. She submits that judgment in Rabia Shah vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. has been distinguished in the case of Suhail Maqbool Dar vs. State of Jammu

Digitally signed by Charanjeet kaur Date: 2021.08.13 17:38:25 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.13 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI-A

1

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 27-11-2020

& Kashmir & Ors**.,(Srinagar Bench), SWP No. 2127/2016, even though the special leave petition in Rabia Shah's case (supra) was dismissed.**

Issue notice.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.15 accepts notice. Remaining respondents be served dasti as well.

In the meantime, we direct that the regularization would take effect in terms of the impugned judgment for the existing vacancies. The effect is that if sufficient number of vacancies exists, all the respondents will be beneficiaries but if there is a deficiency of vacancies, then such of the respondents who by seniority would be entitled as per the existing vacancies would get the benefit, and others would get the benefit from the date the vacancy arose. The result is that regularization will take place from the date of the corresponding vacancies.

[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(22) - 4 Dec 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 4 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 9 Jul 2024

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 8 Apr 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 15 May 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 21 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 29 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 20 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 20 Feb 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 29 Sept 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 22 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 25 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 25 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 18 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 18 Jan 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 20 Oct 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(5) - 17 Sept 2021

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 6 Sept 2021

ROP

Viewing

Order(3) - 13 Aug 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 16 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 15 Mar 2021

ROP

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Same Parties

Search in District Courts Data