Abdul Rasak vs. The State Of Kerala

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:1 Apr 2025
CNR:SCIN010043852024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Registrar

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Remarks:

List On (Date) [14-05-2025]

Listed On:

4 Jan 2025

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

<table><tbody>REGISTRAR COURTSECTION XI-A</tbody> ITEM NO.66

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. GRACY L. BAWITLUNG

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2992-2995/2024

ABDUL RASAK & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Respondent(s)

Date: 01-04-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. Jogy Scaria, AOR
Mrs. Beena Victor, Adv.
Mr. Ashwani Kumar Soni, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR
Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv.
Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv.
Mr. Santhosh K, Adv.
Mr. Prateek Bhatia, AOR
Mr. Dhawal Mohan, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Raj, Adv.
Mr Mohd. Aman Alam, Adv.
Mr Aditya Narendranath, Adv.
Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR
Mr. Aditya Sharan, Adv.
Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally signed byMs. Aakashi Lodha, AOR
Ms. Anu B., AOR
Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Bibhuti Krishna, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Choudhary, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C)NO.2992/2024

Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit but after opportunity to file the same was declined on 12.2.2025.Registry to make specific mention of the fact in the office report while placing the matter before the Hon'ble Court.

Opportunity of respondent nos. 2,4 and 11 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Service is complete on respondent nos. 3,5 and 8 but none has entered appearance.

Respondent nos. 6 and 12 to 14 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.

Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps for re-issuing notice to respondent no.7.

Respondent nos.9 and 10 are granted four weeks' time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for respondent no.15 has cured the defects in the counter affidavit.

SLP(C)NO.2993/2024

Respondent no.1 has filed counter affidavit but after opportunity to file the same was declined on 12.2.2025.Registry

Contd….

to make specific mention of the fact in the office report while placing the matter before the Hon'ble Court.

Opportunity of respondent no.2 to file counter affidavit has already been declined.

Respondent nos.3 and 4 are granted four weeks' time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

As per office report, respondent nos. 5 to 7 have failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted and service is complete on respondent no.8. However, ld. Counsel for the said respondents has submitted that counter affidavit has been filed on 31.3.2025 at 3.25 P.M. on behalf of respondent nos. 5 to 8. Registry to verify and update the record. If filed, be taken on record, else further opportunity stands declined for respondent nos. 5 to 7.

Ld. Counsel for respondent no.8 has submitted that on the earlier date, he had wrongly stated that he was not entering appearance for respondent no.8. That particular submission has been retracted today with an apology alongwith the categorical submission that respondent no.8 will be represented by him. Submission is taken on record.

Ld. Counsel for respondent no.9 has cured the defects in the counter affidavit.

Service is complete on respondent nos. 10 to 16 but none has entered appearance.

-3-

Contd….

SLP(C)NO.2994/2024

Respondent no. 1 has failed to file counter affidavit despite last opportunity having been granted, as such, further opportunity stands declined.

Respondent no.2 has filed counter affidavit but after opportunity to file the same was declined on 12.2.2025.Registry to make specific mention of the fact in the office report while placing the matter before the Hon'ble Court.

Service is complete on respondent no.3 but none has entered appearance.

Respondent no.5 is granted four weeks' time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for respondent no.7 has cured the defects in the counter affidavit.

Ld. counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps for re-issuing notice to respondent nos.4 and 6. However, ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that fresh steps have been taken. Registry to verify and do the needful.

SLP(C)NO.2995/2024

Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 has cured the defects in the counter affidavit.

-4-

Respondent no.2 has filed counter affidavit but after opportunity to file the same was declined on 12.2.2025.Registry to make specific mention of the fact in the office report while placing the matter before the Hon'ble Court.

Respondent nos.3 and 6 are granted four weeks' time as last opportunity for filing counter affidavit.

Service is complete on respondent nos. 4 and 5 but none has entered appearance.

List again on 14.05.2025.

GRACY L. BAWITLUNG Registrar

HJ

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(7) - 14 May 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 1 Apr 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(5) - 12 Feb 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 21 Oct 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 29 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 9 Jul 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 9 Feb 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view
Similar Case Search

Search in District Courts Data