Abdul Rasak vs. The State Of Kerala

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MS. SUJATA SINGH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 2992-2995/2024 ABDUL RASAK & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ Date: 12-02-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jogy Scaria, AOR Mr. Pradeep Kumar Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Beena Victor, Adv. Mr. Dhakne Mahesh Chandrakant, Adv. Ms. M Priva, Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Soni, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mrs. Anu K Joy, Adv. Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv. Mr. Santhosh K, Adv. Mr. Vipin Nair, AOR Ms. Aakashi Lodha, AOR Mr. Aditya Sharan, Adv. Ms. Anu B., AOR Mr. Bibhuthi Krishna, Adv. Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv.

<table><tbody>REGISTRAR COURTSECTION XI-A</tbody>

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 2992/2024

ITEM NO.15

Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 11 have failed to file counter ture Not Verified <pre>idavit, despite the grant of last opportunity. Hence,</pre>

further opportunity is hereby declined.

contd...

Counter affidavit filed by respondent No.15 is still defective. Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects.

Respondent Nos. 6 and 12 to 14 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.

Respondent Nos.9 and 10 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps for service on respondent No.7.

Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.

SLP(C) No. 2993/2024

Respondent Nos.1 and 2 have failed to file counter affidavit, despite the grant of last opportunity. Hence, further opportunity is hereby declined.

Counter affidavit filed by respondent No.9 is still defective. Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects.

Respondent Nos.5 to 7 are granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.

It has been submitted by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Aditya Sharan, appearing on behalf of Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocateon-record that it has wrongly been mentioned in the office report that he is entering appearance for respondent No.8 while he is appearing only for respondent Nos.5 to 7. Let the submission be taken on record. Registry to do the needful.

Contd….

Respondent Nos. 3, 4, 8 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.

Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.

SLP(C) No. 2994/2024

Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit, despite the grant of last opportunity. Hence, further opportunity is hereby declined.

Counter affidavit filed by respondent No.7 is still defective. Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects.

Respondent No.1 is granted four weeks' time, as last opportunity, for filing counter affidavit.

Respondent No.5 is granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.

Service is complete on respondent No.3 but none has entered appearance.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is granted two weeks' time to take fresh steps for service on respondent Nos.4 and 6.

SLP(C) No. 2995/2024

Respondent No.2 has failed to file counter affidavit, despite the grant of last opportunity. Hence, further opportunity is hereby declined.

Counter affidavit filed by respondent No.1 is still defective. Four weeks' time is granted to cure the defects.

contd….

Respondent Nos.3 and 6 are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit.

Service is complete on the remaining respondents, but none has entered appearance.

List again on 27.03.2025.

SUJATA SINGH rd Registrar