Alcatel Lucent Usa Inc Through Its Authorized Representative Sh. Nitin Gupta vs. Dit-I, International Taxation
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
12 Feb 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL NO...CC 61 OF 2016 WITH INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1
(Application for condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petition)
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (IT) I ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
M/S SUMITOMO MITSUI BANKING CORPORATION, BSR & CO., ...RESPONDENT
OFFICE REPORT
It is submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petitions abovementioned are filed against the interim Judgment and Order dated 8th July 2015 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in ITA No. 1665 of 2013 and is barred by time by 58 days. The Counsel for the Petitioner has filed Application for Condonation of delay in filing Special Leave Petition.
It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that the Special Leave Petition No. 22014 of 2015 @ S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 13393 of 2015 entitled " DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION I DELHI vs G.E. JAPAN LTD." arising out of similar question of law which was listed before the Hon'ble Court on 3rd August 2015, when the Hon'ble Court has directed to issue notice. (Copy of the Order dated 3rd August 2015) is enclosed herewith for reference.).
It is further submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court the Civil Appeal No. 9251 of 2015 @ S.L.P.(C)...CC No. 19575 of 2015 entitled "COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX10, MUMBAI vs M/S. GODREJ AGROVET LTD." arising out of similar question of law which was listed before the Hon'ble on 2nd November 2015, when the Hon'ble Court has granted leave (Copy of Order dated 2nd November 2015) is also enclosed herewith for reference.).
It is also submitted for information of the Hon'ble Court that counsel for the petitioner has filed a letter dated 2nd January 2016 stating therein that order dated 3rd October 2012 mentioned at page no. 3 of impugned order is not relevant as the appeal is admitted only with regard to the substantial question no. (a) and the said order pertains to question no. (b). Copy of letter is annexed at page no. 313 of the paper book.
The matter alongwith application abovementined is listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO:
Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
PB4