State Of Kerala vs. Assn. Of Mgt. Of Self Fincng. N. C. Of Kerala
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
7 May 2007
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION XIA. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2846, 2847, 2848, 2849, 2850, 2851, 2852, 2853 OF 2007.
State of Kerala & Ors. Etc. etc. ...Appellants
Versus
Manager Malankara O.S.C . Medical College ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
These are an appeals by Special Leave filed against the Judgment & Order dated 4 th January, 2007 of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.P. © Nos. 18906 /2006 (A), 17969/2006 (L), 19888/2006 (P), 17873/2006 ©, 18999/2006 (Y), 18553/2006 (H), 18299(C) and 198584/2006 (F).
The service of notice in the appeals abovementioned are as follows:
C.A. No. 2846 of 2007.
There is sole respondent in the appeal abovementioned and is represented through M/s. Lawyers Knit & co., Advocates.
C.A. No. 2847 of 2007.
There are 10 respondents in the appeal abovementioned and Respondent Nos. 1, 4, 7, 810 are represented through M/s. Romy Chacko, Abhijit Sen Gupta, K.R. Nambiar and R.S. Jena, Advocates respectively. Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 & 6 have been served at SLP stage but no one has entered appearance so far.
C.A. No. 2848 of 2007.
There are 8 respondents in the appeal abovementioned and all the respondents have been served at SLP stage but no one has entered appearance so far.
C.A. No. 2849 of 2007.
There are 21 respondents in the appeal abovementioned and Respondent No.1 is represented through Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate. Respondent Nos. 2 to 21 have been served at SLP stage but no one has entered appearance so far. ...2/
C.A. No. 2850 of 2007.
There are 3 respondents in the appeal abovementioned and Respondent No. 1 is represented through Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate. Respondent No. 2 is represented through M/s. Lawer's Knit & Co., Advocate. Respondent No. 3 is represented through Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate.
C.A. No. 2851 of 2007.
There are 3 respondents in the appeal abovementioned and Respondent Nos.1 & 2 are represented through Mr. Romy Chacko, Advocate. Respondent No.3 has been served at SLP stage but no one has entered appearance so far.
C.A. No. 2852 of 2007.
There is sole respondent in the appeal abovementioned and he has been served at SLP stage but no one has entered vakalatnama/appearance so far.
C.A. No. 2853 of 2007.
There are 10 respondent in the appeal abovementioned. Respondent No.1 is represented by Mr. E.M.S. Anam, Advocate, Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are represented by Mr. Asha G. Nair, Advocate, Respondent No.5 is represented by Mr. Ranjit K.C., Advocate, Respondent No.6 is represented by Mr. R. Neduraman, Advocate, Respondent No.7 is represented by Mr. M.P. Vinod, Advocate and Respondent Nos. 8 to 10 are represented by Mr. P.V. Dinesh, Advocate.
Service of Notice of Lodgment of Petition of Appeal is complete on all the respondent in all the abovesaid matters.
Original Records have been returned to the concerned High Court in the appeals abovementioned.
The matters abovementioned are listed before the Court with this report.
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2016.
sd/
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
...3/