State Of Kerala vs. Assn. Of Mgt. Of Self Fincng. N. C. Of Kerala

\226K W.P(C)No. 350 OF 1993 ITEM No.1A Court No. 1 SECTION X (for Judgment) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition (Civil) No. 350 of 1993 ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION & ANR. Petitioner (s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Respondent (s) WITH SLP(C) Nos. 11286/2003, 11391/2003, 11189-95/2003, WP(C) Nos. 355/1993, 174/2003, TP(C) Nos. 286-288/2003, SLP(C) Nos. 3465-3466/2003, 3942-3943/2003, 4002-4003/2003, 9253-9254/2003, 10561/2003, WP(C) Nos. 261/2003, 275/2003, 280/2003 and 289/2003. (Heard by Hon'ble the Chief Justice, Hon'ble S.N. Variava, K.G. Balakrishnan, Arijit Pasayat and S.B. Sinha, JJ.) Date : 14/08/2003 These Petitions were called on for pronouncement of Judgment today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. VARIAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.G. BALAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA For Petitioner (s) in WP 350, 355 & 174Dr. Roxna S Swamy, Adv. Mr. A Lobo, Adv. Mr. Subhash C Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ramesh N Keswani, Adv. Mr. Bharat Sangal, Adv. in SLP 11286Ms. Niranjana Singh, Adv. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Nayyar, Adv. Mr. Trideep Pias, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Vimla Sinha, Adv. Ms. M.V. Seshachala, Adv. in SLP 11391Mr. Madhu Naik, Adv. Mr. S Sukumaran, Adv. Mr. Suresh Unnikrishnan, Adv. Ms. Divya Nair, Adv. Mr. K Rajeev, Adv. in SLP 11189-95Mr. Harish N Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. Madhusudan R Naik, Adv. Mr. S Ravindra Bhat, Adv.

Mr. Naveen R Nath, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv. Ms. Hetu Arora, Adv. in TP 286-288Mr. K K Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Vijay Narain, Adv. Mr. C B N Babu, Adv. Mr. Bimal Roy Jad, Adv. State of KeralaMr. K K Venugopal, Sr. Adv. Mr. K R Sasiprabhu, Adv. Mr. John Mathew, Adv. Mr. Anil Thomas, Adv. in SLP 4002-4003Mr. G Prakash,Adv. in SLP 10561Mr. Harish N Salve, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Prasanth P, Adv. for M/s. Lawyer's Knit & Co., Advs. in WP 261Mr. Harish N Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. P H Parekh, Adv. Mr. Krishna Srinivasan, Adv. Mr. E R Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Alex, Adv. for M/s. P H Parekh & Co., Advs. in WP 275Mr. Harish N Salve, Sr. Adv. Mr. S Nanda Kumar, Adv. Mr. V Vijayan, Adv. Mr. M Yogesh Kanna, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Shankar, Adv. Mr. Anuj Kr. Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Rakesh K Sharma, Adv. in WP 280 & 289Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Adv. for NCT, Delhi and UTMr. Raju Ramachandran, ASG Mr. S W A Qadri, Adv. Ms. Rekha Pandey, Adv. Mr. D S Mahra, Adv. for M/o HRDMr. Raju Ramachandran, ASG Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Mr. S Wasim A Qadri, Adv. Mr. K C Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Adv. For Respondent (s) Mr. K C Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Pritesh Kapur, Adv. Mr. Prateek Jalan, Adv. Mr. Sunil Mathews, Adv. Ms. Anil Katiyar, Adv. State of Karnataka in WP 350 & SLP 11189-95 Mr. Sanjay R Hegde, Adv. and in rest of the Mr. Satya Mitra, Adv. matters Mr. Anil K Mishra, Adv. Ms. Mahalaxmi Pavani, Adv. UoIMr. Maninder Singh, Adv. Ms. Pratibha M Singh, Adv. Mr. Angad Mirdha,Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv.

Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Adv. Mr. K C Kaushik, Adv. Mr. D S Mahra, Adv. MCIMr. Maninder Singh, Adv. Ms. Pratibha M Singh, Adv. Mr. Angad Mirdha, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Adv. in SLP 11286 & 11391Mr. G Prabhakar, Adv. in SLP 11286 & 11391Mr. J S Attri, Addl.Adv.Genl., HP in SLP 11189-95Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv. State of A.P. Mr. T.V. Ratnam, Adv. Mr. K. Subba Rao, Adv. in WP 355Mr. S.R. Bhat, Adv. Ms. Meenakshi Vij, Adv. In SLP 3465-66, 3942-43, 4002-03 & 9253-54Mr. Harish N. Salve, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr. Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Ms. Bina Madhavan, Adv. Mr. Prasanth P., Adv. For M/s Lawyer's Knit & Co., Advs. in SLP 3465-66Mr. Dipankar P. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. P.H. Parekh, Adv. Mr. T.N. Subramnium, Adv. Mr. E.R. Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Alex, Adv. State of GoaMr. Bhavanishaqnkar V. Gadnis, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar Suri, Adv. Ms. A. Subhashini, Adv. in SLP 3465-66 & 9253-54 Mr. G. Prabhakar, Adv. in SLP 3465-66Mr. A. Mariarputham, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. For M/s Arputham, Aruna & Co., Advs. State of U.P.Mr. A.K. Srivastava, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shamshery, Adv. State of AssamMs. Krishna Sarma, Adv. Ms. Asha G. Nair, Adv. Mr. V.K. Siddharthan, Adv. For M/s Corporate law Group, Advs. State of M.P.Mr. Sakesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, Adv. State of West BengalMr. T.C. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Neelam Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Sharma, Adv.

State of ManipurMr. KH. Nobin Singh, Adv. State of Gujarat Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. State of MizoramMs. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. State of Maharashtra Mr. U.U. Lalit, Adv. Mr. S.S. Shinde, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. State of NagalandMr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. Mr. Satyajit Saha, Adv. Ms. V.D. Khanna, Adv. State of RajasthanMr. Ranji Thomas, Adv. Ms. Bharti Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Arun Pednekar, Adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv. State of Arunachal Pradesh Mr. Anil Shrivastava, Adv. State of TripuraMr. Gopal Singh, Adv. Mr. Navin Prakash, Adv. State of OrissaMs. Kirti Renu Mishra, Adv. State of J&KMr. Anis Suhrawardy, Adv. State of HaryanaMr. Neeraj Kumar Jain, Adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia, Adv. Govt. of Pondicherry Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv. State of UttaranchalMr.Avatar Singh Rawat, Addl.Adv. Genl. Mr. Jitender Kumar Bhatia, Adv. State of PunjabMr. R.S. Suri, Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabre, Adv. Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. in WP 261 & 275 (State of Tamil Nadu) Mr. P.N. Ramalingam, Adv. Mr. V. Balaji, Adv. in WP 261, 275, 280 & 289 Mr. T. Raja, Adv. For Intervenor (s) Mr. Rakesh K.Sharma, Adv. For Applicant (s) in SLP 11189-95: I.A.Nos. 15-21,22-28Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. I.A. Nos. 29-35Mr. N.L.Ganpathi, Adv. I.A. Nos. 36-42Mr. K.K.Venugopal, Sr.Adv. Mr. Bimal Roy Jad, Adv. Mr. C.B.N.Babu, Adv.

I.A. Nos. 43-49 Mr. Bharat Kumar, Adv. Mr. Bhupender Yadav, Adv. Ms. Sheela Goel, Adv. I.A. Nos. 50-56Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Adv. I.A. Nos. 57-63Mr. P.H.Parekh, Adv. For M/s. P.H.Parekh & Co., Advs. I.A. Nos. 64-71Ms. Madhu Moolchandani, Adv. In WP 350: I.A. Nos.10-13Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Sr.Adv. Mr. H.N.Salve, Sr.Adv. Mr. R.Santhana Krishnan, Adv. Mr. D.Mahesh Babu, Adv. I.A.Nos. 14-15Mr. A.Mariarputham, Adv. Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv. For M/s. Arputham, Aruna & Co. I.A.No. 16Mr. Dipankar P. Gupta, Sr.Adv. Mr. P.H.Parekh, Adv. Mr. E.R.Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Alex, Adv. Mr. Lalit Chauhan, Adv. Mr. Duval C.Dave, Adv. For M/s. P.H.Parekh & Co. I.A. No. 17 Ms. Aparna Bhat, Adv. Mr.P.Ramesh Kumar, Adv. I.A. No. 18Dr. Rajeev Dhavan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Adv. Mr. Wajid Ali Kamil, Adv. Mr. Ujjwal Kr. Jha, Adv. Ms. Minakshi Nag, Adv. I.A. 19 & 21Mr. Dipankar P Gupta, Sr. Adv. Ms. Deepti Chowdhury, Adv. Ms. Sarla Chandra, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Sen, Adv. Mr. Rana S.Biswas, Adv. In TP 287: I.A. 4Mr. Gourav Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Joseph Pookkatt, Adv. In SLP 3465-66: I.A. 2Mr. Dipankar P Gupta, Sr.Adv. Mr. T.N.Subramanian, Adv. Mr. P.H.Parekh, Adv. Mr. E.R.Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rohit Alex, Adv. For M/s. P.H.Parekh & Co., Advs. I.A. Nos. 5-6 Mr. M.Qamaruddin, Adv. Mrs.M.Qamaruddin, Adv. Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin, Adv. Mr. Manish Goswami, Adv. In W.P. 261:

I.A. No.2Mr. P.H.Parekh, Adv. For M/s. P.H.Parekh & Co., Advs.

Hon'ble the Chief Justice pronounced judgment for self and for Hon'ble S.N. Variava, K.G. Bala krishnan and Arijit Pasayat, JJ. Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.B. Sinha pronounced a separate judgmen t.

In the majority judgment, the following interim order is passed :

"So far as the year 2003-2004 is concerned, time is running out as the outer time limit for ad mission is fast approaching or has gone. To meet the urgent situation without going into the issues involved in the various petitions/applications, we direct that the seats be filled up b y the institution and the State Governments in the ratio 50:50. However, if by any interim or der, this Court has permitted any institution to fill up a higher percentage of seats and the seats have been filled up accordingly, the same shall not be disturbed. It is made clear that due to the time constraint this arrangement has been made, without deciding the contentious i ssues involved in various pending cases."

With the clarifications given in the majority judgment, it is directed that all the matters be placed before the regular Benches for disposal on merits. All interlocutory applications as regards interim matters stand disposed of. REPORTABLE.

(Two separate signed judgments are placed on the file)