Common Cause vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
10 Feb 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.305 & 802 COURT NO.7 SECTION PIL
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. 3/2014 in Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 114/2014
17:53:54 IST Reason:
COMMON CAUSE Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (for impleadment/directions and office report) WITH I.A. No._______/2014 (Diary No.119714) in WP(C) No.114/2014 Date : 12/09/2014 These applications were called on for hearing/mentioned today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv. In WP 114/2014 Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv. For Applicant(s) Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Adv. In IA No.3 Mr. Ashok K. Parija, Sr. Adv. Mr. Dilip Das, Adv. Mr. Anand Varma, Adv. Mr. R.M. Patnaik, Adv. For Applicant(s) Mr. Anand Varma, Adv. In D.No.119714 Mr. R.M. Patnaik, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Maninder Singh, ASG (UOI) Mr. J.S. Attri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Adv. Ms. S.K. Bajwa, Adv. Ms. V. Mohana, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Panda, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tejaswi Kumar Pradhan,Adv. Mr. M. Paikaray, Adv. Mr. S. Dwivedy, Adv. Digitally signed by Parveen Kumar Chawla Date: 2014.09.12 Signature Not Verified
Ms. Kirti R. Mishra, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
I.A. No.3 in WP(C) No.114/2014
Learned counsel for the applicant states, that the applicant has wrongly been classified as non-working lease. It is submitted that the applicant has environmental clearance, a forest clearance, as also the consent to operate.
Issue notice.
Mr. A.D.N. Rao, Advocate accepts notice. He seeks a week's time to enable him to obtain instructions.
Prayer is allowed.
List again on 19.09.2014.
Instructions be obtained, in the meantime.
Writ Petition(C) No. 114 of 2014
Mr. Maninder Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General representing the Union of India is present in the Court. We request him to place the report of Justice Shah Commission, which was tabled before the Parliament, on the record of this case. Needful be done within two weeks.
List after four weeks.
I.A. No. /2014(D.No.119714) in WP(C) No.114/2014
On a mention made by Mr. Anand Varma, learned counsel for the applicant, we direct to list the interlocutory application for hearing after two months.
(Parveen Kr. Chawla) (Phoolan Wati Arora)
Court Master Assistant Registrar