Velagapudi Vishnu Charan vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble Sanjay Karol
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed as withdrawn
Listed On:
20 Feb 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.22 COURT NO.16 SECTION II
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 2084/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-11-2022 in A482 No. 316/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad, Lucknow Bench)
VELAGAPUDI VISHNU CHARAN & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.31345/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.31344/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date : 20-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
**Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that because of the mis-communication between the lawyer and the litigant, the money ordered to be deposited by the High Court on 30.08.2022, could not be deposited. This is the main reason for the High Court in refusing to entertain the petition under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by the husband and the in-**Digitally signed by Deepak Singh Date: 2023.02.22 18:00:36 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
laws of Smt. Vibhavari (Respondent No.2).
It is further submitted that the petitioner No.1 is very much interested in settlement of the matrimonial dispute with the second respondent and therefore the petitioner intends to file a review petition before the High Court depositing the ordered sum so that the petition under Section 482 CrPC can be considered on merit by the Court. For the said purpose, the learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the present Special Leave Petition.
In view of the above submission, the Special Leave Petition stands dismissed as not pressed reserving the liberty as aforesaid.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)