Ravi Rajan Pandayan vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble J.K. Maheshwari
Stage:
BAIL MATTERS
Remarks:
List On (Date) [20-04-2023]
Listed On:
13 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.1402/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13012023 in ABA No. 3427/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
RAVI RAJAN PANDAYAN Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
Date : 13032023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Reason:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. K. Parameshwar, Adv. Mr. Ajit Pravin Wagh, AOR Mr. Yogesh K. Ahirrao, Adv. Mr. Ajit Pravin Wagh Aor, Adv. Ms. Neeta Sanjay Savale, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR
Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv.
Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv.
Mr. Atul B. Dakh, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Application seeking impleadment of complainant as a party respondent is allowed. Digitally signed by VISHAL ANAND Date: 2023.03.20 10:20:26 IST Signature Not Verified
Cause title be amended accordingly.
In purported compliance of order dated 10022023, learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over four Demand Drafts for a total sum of Rs.17,20,000/ to learned counsel for the complainant.
Let the abovestated amount be accepted by the complainant, without prejudice to his legal rights.
List the matter on 20042023.
Interim protection to continue.
(VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)
ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.9 SECTION IIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.1402/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13012023 in ABA No. 3427/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
RAVI RAJAN PANDAYAN Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
Date : 13032023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. K. Parameshwar, Adv. | |
---|---|
Mr. Ajit Pravin Wagh, AOR | |
Mr. Yogesh K. Ahirrao, Adv. | |
Mr. Ajit Pravin Wagh Aor, Adv. | |
Ms. Neeta Sanjay Savale, Adv. | |
For Respondent(s) | |
Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. | |
Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. | |
Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR | |
Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. | |
Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv. | |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following | |
O R D E R |
Application seeking impleadment of complainant as a party respondent is allowed.
Cause title be amended accordingly.
In purported compliance of order dated 10022023, learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over four Demand Drafts for a total sum of Rs.17,25,000/ to learned counsel for the complainant.
Let the abovestated amount be accepted by the complainant, without prejudice to his legal rights.
List the matter on 20042023. Interim protection to continue.
(VISHAL ANAND) (PREETHI T.C.) ASTT. REGISTRARcumPS COURT MASTER (NSH)