National Campaign Committee For Central Legislation For Construction Labour (Ncccl) Coordinator Shri Subhash Bhatnagar vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Labour And Employment Labour Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
6 Feb 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
RF 1
ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.9 SECTION PIL(W)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).318/2006
NATIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMTT., C.L., LABOUR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for impleadment and office report) (For final disposal) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No. 52/2013 in W.P.(C) No. 318/2006 Date : 04/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Adv. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. Mr. Divya Jyoti Jaipuriar, Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR For Respondent(s) Union of India Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv. Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Ms. Gunwant Dara, Adv. Mr. Zaid Ali, Adv. Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, AOR For States of Delhi Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, Adv. Signature Not Verified Mr. Bhaskar Das, Adv. Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2015.09.07 Ms. Swati Vaibhav, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, AOR 17:21:22 IST Reason: Andhra Pradesh Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.
Ms. Deepika Singh, Adv.<br>for M/s. Corporate Law Group | ||
---|---|---|
Arunachal Pradesh | Mr. Anil Shrivastav, AOR<br>Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv. | |
Bihar | Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. | |
Chhattisgarh | Mr. C.D. Singh, AAG<br>Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, Adv.<br>Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Adv. | |
Gujarat | Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR<br>Ms. Jesal Wahi, Adv.<br>Ms. Vinakshi Kadan, Adv. | |
Haryana | Ms. Nupur Choudhary, Adv.<br>for Mr. T. V. George, AOR | |
H.P. | Mr. Suryanaryana Singh, Sr. AAG<br>Ms. Pragati Neekhra, Adv. | |
Jharkhand | Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, AOR<br>Mr. R.K. Ojha, Adv. | |
Kerala | Ms. Bina Madhavan, AOR | |
Madhya Pradesh | Mr. Sunny Choudhary, Adv.<br>Mr. Mishra Saurabh, Adv. | |
Maharashtra | Mr. Kunal A. Cheema, Adv.<br>Mr. Nishant Katneshwarkar, Adv. | |
Manipur | Mr.<br>Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Ashok Kumar Singh, AOR<br>Mr.<br>Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>S. Vijayanand Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms.<br>B. Khusbansi, Adv. | |
Meghalaya | Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee, AOR<br>Mr. Subhro Sanyal, Adv. | |
Mizoram | Mr.<br>Pragyan Sharma, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Shikhar Garg, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>P. V. Yogeswaran, AOR<br>Mr.<br>T.L.V. Ramachandran, Adv.<br>Mr.<br>K.V.L. Raghavn, Adv.<br>3 | |
Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. | ||
Nagaland | Mrs. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv.<br>Mr. Edward Belho, Adv.<br>Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Balaji Srinivasan, AOR | |
Odisha | Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, AOR<br>Mr. M.K. Pandey, Adv. | |
Punjab | Mr. Ajay Bansal, AAG<br>Mr. Vijendra Khurana, Adv.<br>Mr. Gaurav Yadava, Adv. | |
Sikkim | Ms.<br>Mr. | Aruna Mathur, Adv.<br>Avneeh Arputham, Adv. |
Mr.<br>Yusuf Khan, Adv.<br>for<br>M/s Arputham Aruna & Co. | |
---|---|
Tamil Nadu | Mr. B. Balaji, AOR<br>Mr. R. Rakesh Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms. R. Shase, Adv. |
Telengana | Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Adv.<br>Mr. Prashant Kr. Tyagi, Adv. |
Tripura | Mr. Gopal Singh, AOR<br>Mr. Rituraj Biswas, Adv.<br>Ms. Varsha Poddar, Adv. |
Uttar Pradesh | Mr. V.K. Shukla, AAG<br>Mr. Vibhu Tiwari, Adv.<br>Mr. Ravi Prakash Mehrotra, AOR |
Uttarakhand | Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia, AOR<br>Mr. Mukesh Verma, Adv.<br>Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy, AOR |
West Bengal | Mr. Anip Sachthey, Adv.<br>Ms. Shagun Matta, Adv.<br>Mr. Saakaar Sardana, Adv. |
A&N Islands | Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv.<br>Mrs. G. Indira, Adv.<br>Mr. Balasubramanian, Adv. |
Puducherry | Mr. V.G. Pragasam, AOR<br>Mr. Prabu Ramasubramanian, Adv. |
4
Mr. Abhijit Sengupta, AOR Mr. Arun K. Sinha, AOR Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee, AOR Mr. B. S. Banthia, AOR Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, AOR Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR Mr. Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, AOR Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, AOR Mr. Shrish Kumar Misra, AOR Mrs. Nandini Gore, AOR Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma, AOR Mr. T. Harish Kumar, AOR Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, AOR Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
There does not seem to have been any progress made pursuant to our order dated 21.08.2015.
Mr. Yashank Adhyaru, learned senior counsel appearing for the Union of India says that he has not received any definite instructions in spite of the Central Agency having contacted the Ministry of Labour, Government of India.
5
The attitude of the Ministry of Labour can hardly be appreciated, particularly in view of the fact that the amounts involved are said to be in the region of about Rs.27,000 crores, as informed by learned amicus curiae.
In view of the fact that this matter is being dealt with in such a casual manner by the Union of India, we have no option but to require the presence of the Secretary in the Ministry of Labour, Government of India on the next date of hearing. We, accordingly, direct the Secretary in the Ministry of Labour to be present in Court on 11th September, 2015. The said Secretary will remain present in Court along with a possible action plan and after having fully briefed the learned senior counsel appearing for the Union of India.
We have already indicated in our earlier order dated 21.08.2015 that given the attitude of the State Governments/ Union Territories and the Central Government, it may perhaps be more appropriate not to collect this money since it is not being utilized for the benefit of the persons for whom it is collected, but for other purposes. We had hoped that this observation will have some salutary effect on the officers of the State Governments/ Union Territories and the Central Government, but obviously it has had absolutely no effect on the concerned officers.
Perhaps, we may have to take steps to devise some way of recording our displeasure, if necessary, in the Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) of the concerned officers.
In view of the unfortunate and casual attitude of the Government of India and the State Governments and Union Territories in this regard, learned amicus curiae and learned senior counsel for the petitioner have agreed to prepare, on their own, a possible action plan on the utilization of the amount of about Rs.27,000 crores and any other further amounts that may have been collected under the statute.
List the matter on 11th September, 2015.
(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (JASWINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER
6