New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs. Ravinder Kumar @ Vickey
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.9 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 534/2020 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY PRIVATE LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (IA No. 132263/2020 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) Date : 24-02-2021 This matter was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meenakshi Arora,Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth, AOR Ms. Mamta Meghwal, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Jagdish Solaniki, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. J.K. Sud, Ld. ASG Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. Mr. Bhuvan Mishra, Adv. Mr. Navanjay Mahapatra, Adv. Ms. Sanya Sud, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makker, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv. Arunachal Pradesh Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR Ms. Eliza Bar, Adv. Chhattisgarh Mr. Sourav Roy, Adv./Dy. Adv. Gen. Mr. Mahesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Suushant Yadav, Adv. Mr. Prabudh Singh, Adv. Mr. Leela Dhar Prajapat, Adv. Ms. Devika Khanna, Adv. Mrs. V.D. Khanna, Adv. M/s VMZ Chambers, AOR Gujarat Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Adv. Mr. Aniruddha P. Mayee, AOR Digitally signed by Anita Malhotra Date: 2021.02.26 10:11:32 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
| Mr. Raj Kamal, AOR | |
|---|---|
| Maharashtra | Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv.<br>Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR<br>Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv.<br>Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. |
| Manipur | Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR<br>Ms. Anupama Ng., Adv.<br>Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv. |
| Meghalaya | Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, AOR<br>Ms. Rekha Bakshi, Adv.<br>Ms. T.K. Nayak, Adv. |
| Mr. Siddhesh Kotwal, Adv.<br>Ms. Ana Upadhyay, Adv.<br>MR. Nirnimesh Dube, AOR | |
| Mr. Som Raj Choudhury, AOR | |
| Tamil Nadu | Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR<br>Mr. RajaRajeshwaran S., Adv.<br>Mr. Aditya Chadha, Adv.<br>Mr. Uma Prasuna Bachu, Adv. |
| Telangana | Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, AOR<br>Ms. Sweena Nair, Adv. |
| Mr. Chirag M. Shroff, AOR<br>Ms. Abhilasha Bharti, Adv.<br>Mr. Sushant Dogra, Adv. | |
| Puducherry | Mr. V.G. Pragasam, AOR<br>Mr. S. Prabhu Ramasubramanian, Adv. |
| Nagaland | Ms. K Enatoli Sema, Adv.<br>Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. |
| Uttar Pradesh | Mr. Pradeep Misra, Adv.<br>Mr. Suraj Singh, Adv. |
| UT/Andaman &<br>Nicobar Islands | Mr. K.V. Jagdishvaran, Adv.<br>Mrs. G. Indira, AOR |
| Kerala | Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv.<br>Ms. Beena Prakash, Adv.<br>Mr. G. Prakash, AOR |
| Goa | Mr. Ravindra A. Lokhande, Adv.<br>Dr. Abhishek Atrey, AOR<br>Ms. Ambika Atrey, Adv. |
| Tripura | Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Adv.<br>Mr. Kabir Shankar Bose, Adv. |
|---|---|
| GNCTD | Mr. Chirag M Shroff, Adv.<br>Ms. Abhilasha Bharti, Adv.<br>Mr. Sushant Dogra, Adv. |
| Haryana | Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR |
| Andhra Pradesh | Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR<br>Ms. Polanki Gowtham, Adv.<br>Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv.<br>Mr. T. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv.<br>Mr. Amitabh Sinha, Adv.<br>Mr Shrey Sharma, Adv. |
| Rajasthan | Mr. Vishal Meghwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Milind Kumar, AOR |
| West Bengal | Mr. Soumitra G. Chaudhuri, Adv.<br>Mr. Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Adv. |
| Puducherry | Mr. V.G. Pragasam, Adv.<br>Mr. S. Prabhu Ramasubramanian, Adv. |
| Assam | Mr. Nalin Kohli, AAG/Adv.<br>Mr. Shuvodeep Roy.AOR<br>Mr. Ankit Roy, Adv. |
| Arunachal Pradesh | Mr. Abhimanyu Tewari, AOR<br>Ms. Eliza Bar, Adv. |
| Mr. Vipin Nair, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Mr. Jayant Sud, learned ASG submits that he will make a coordinated effort and will have a virtual conference with all the stakeholders represented before us to facilitate the agreed directions to be submitted before us and to the extent there is a difference of perceptions, those can also be placed before us.
In this behalf, Mr. Vipin Nair seeks to represent Mr. Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan, Advocate, who is dealing with the subject and submits that there are certain directions issued by the Madras High Court and the Committee of the Supreme Court dealing with the use of Artificial Intelligence is also examining some aspects. It is thus his submission that the directions to be issued should be in consonance with the same. This aspect can also be discussed in the virtual conference which has been agreed to be held. Mr. Vipin Nair may be given the connectivity for the next date as we will permit him/Mr. Narasimhan Vijayaraghavan also to assist us in this behalf.
Mr. Sourav Roy, Deputy Advocate General/Adv.l appearing for the State of Chhattisgarh submits that the Ministry of Road and Transport (MORT) should also assist in this behalf because they have some aggregated platforms which may also be of assistance in arriving at those agreed directions. The learned ASG submits that he will make sure of that.
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that she has made some suggestions keeping in mind that the Delhi High Court and the Madras High Court inter alia have placed very effective machinery to take care of
practically all the problems and largely those directions can be replicated. This aspect would also be examined during the discussion.
The aforesaid should be filed before us latest by 12.03.2021.
List on 16.03.2021.
(CHARANJEET KAUR) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)