Pratap vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh
AI Summary
In a significant procedural development, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed by Pratap and others, upholding a prior judgment from the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. This decision effectively concludes the challenge against the High Court's criminal ruling, affirming the earlier court's stance.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
Pratap and others filed Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 4999/2010 in the Supreme Court, challenging the judgment and order dated 03/11/2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Criminal Appeal No. 183/1995. The Supreme Court, after hearing counsel, dismissed the Special Leave Petition on July 30, 2010.
Timeline of Events
Criminal Appeal No. 183/1995 was filed/pending before the High Court of M.P. at Indore.
The High Court of M.P. at Indore delivered its judgment and order in CRLA No. 183/1995.
The Special Leave Petition was filed in the Supreme Court.
The Special Leave Petition was registered as 4999/2010.
The Supreme Court heard and dismissed Special Leave Petition (Crl) No. 4999/2010.
Primary Legal Issues
Secondary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioners, Pratap and others, through their counsel, presented arguments seeking to convince the Supreme Court to admit their Special Leave Petition, challenging the legality or correctness of the High Court's criminal judgment dated 03/11/2009.
Respondent's Arguments
While not explicitly detailed in the order, the respondent, State of Madhya Pradesh, would have implicitly argued for the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition, asserting the correctness and finality of the High Court's judgment.
Court's Reasoning
The order is brief and states, 'The special leave petition is dismissed.' No detailed reasoning or legal analysis for the dismissal is provided within this specific record of proceedings. The dismissal suggests the Court did not find sufficient grounds to interfere with the impugned High Court order at the Special Leave Petition stage.
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.The special leave petition is dismissed.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a summary dismissal of a Special Leave Petition without providing any detailed reasoning or laying down new legal principles. It is a procedural order and does not create binding precedent on points of law.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
16 Mar 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
* ITEM NO.34 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4999/2010 (From the judgement and order dated 03/11/2009 in CRLA No. 183/1995 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT INDORE) PRATAP AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) (With appln. for exemption from filing O.T., bail and exemption from filing proof of surrender) (CRLMP.NO.12860/2010 for exem.from filing separate proof of surrender) Date: 30/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain,Adv. Mr. Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms.Eshita Barua, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The special leave petition is dismissed. [ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ]
Court Master Court Master