Pratap vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble P. Sathasivam
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:8 Jul 2010
CNR:SCIN010037542010

AI Summary

The Supreme Court in this Special Leave Petition (Criminal) is hearing a challenge against a judgment from the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The petition, filed by Pratap and others, concerns a criminal matter and was listed for further arguments, indicating ongoing legal scrutiny at the apex court level.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:4999/2010
Case Type:Special Leave Petition (Criminal)
Case Sub-Type:SLP - Criminal Appeal
Secondary Case Numbers:3754/2010
Order Date:2010-07-08
Filing Year:2010
Court:Supreme Court of India
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble P. Sathasivam, Hon'ble Anil R. Dave

Petitioner's Counsel

Sushil Kumar Jain
Advocate - Appeared
Puneet Jain
Advocate - Appeared
Veena
Advocate - Appeared
Chisti Jain
Advocate - Appeared

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

This order pertains to a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed by Pratap and others, challenging a judgment and order dated November 3, 2009, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Criminal Appeal No. 183/1995. The Supreme Court heard the petition on July 8, 2010, and directed it to be listed after two weeks.

Timeline of Events

1995

Criminal Appeal No. 183/1995 filed in High Court of M.P.

2009-11-03

Judgment and order passed by The High Court of M.P. at Indore in CRLA No. 183/1995.

2010-02-03

Special Leave Petition (Crl) filed in Supreme Court.

2010-07-08

Supreme Court heard the Special Leave Petition and directed it to be listed after two weeks.

Primary Legal Issues

1.Legality and correctness of the High Court's judgment in Criminal Appeal No. 183/1995

Secondary Legal Issues

1.Admissibility of the Special Leave Petition
2.Grounds for interference with a criminal conviction/sentence

Court's Reasoning

The court made a procedural order to list the matter for hearing after two weeks, indicating that arguments or further proceedings are yet to take place.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Strict Adherence to Procedure
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Adjourned

Impugned Orders

High Court of M.P. at Indore
Case: CRLA No. 183/1995
Date: 2009-11-03

Specific Directions

  1. 1.List after two weeks.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This order is purely procedural, merely directing the listing of the case for a future date, and contains no substantive legal pronouncement or reasoning.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Note the next listing date for following the case progress.
2.Ensure all necessary applications (like bail, exemption from surrender) are processed as indicated in the application details.
3.Understand that initial Supreme Court hearings for SLPs often involve procedural listings before substantive arguments.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court Special Leave Petition Criminal ProcedureChallenging High Court Criminal Appeal JudgmentAdjournment of Criminal Matter Supreme Court IndiaProcedural Order in Criminal Justice SystemListing Directions for Special Leave Petition CriminalMadhya Pradesh High Court Criminal Case Review

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

16 Mar 2010

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).4999/2010

(From the judgement and order dated 03/11/2009 in CRLA No. 183/1995 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT INDORE)

PRATAP AND ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s)

(With appln. for exemption from filing O.T.,bail,exemption from filing separate proof of surrender)

Date: 08/07/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain,Adv. Mr.Puneet Jain, Adv. Ms.Veena, Adv. Ms.Chisti Jain, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

List after two weeks.

[ Usha Bhardwaj ] [ Savita Sainani ] Court Master Court Master