Pratap vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh
AI Summary
In a significant procedural development, the Supreme Court Registrar allowed the Special Leave Petition (Criminal) to proceed by condoning a minor delay in its refiling. This decision ensures that the petitioners can continue to challenge the High Court's judgment, keeping their legal avenues open in a case originating from a 1995 criminal appeal.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
The petitioners, Radhu and Ors., sought to file a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) in the Supreme Court against a High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated November 3, 2009, which arose from a Criminal Appeal (CRLA No. 183/1995). There was a delay of 11 days in refiling the SLP, for which an application for condonation was filed.
Timeline of Events
Criminal Appeal No. 183/1995 filed in High Court of M.P. at Indore.
Judgment and order passed by High Court of M.P. at Indore in CRLA No. 183/1995.
Special Leave Petition (Crl) filed in Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Registrar condoned 11 days delay in refiling SLP.
Key Factual Findings
There was a delay of 11 days in refiling the Special Leave Petition (Criminal).
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
Petitioners sought condonation of delay of 11 days in refiling their Special Leave Petition (Criminal), likely providing reasons for the delay.
Respondent's Arguments
No arguments were presented by the respondent side regarding the condonation of delay.
Court's Reasoning
The Registrar considered the application for condonation of delay in refiling the Special Leave Petition and decided to condone the delay of 11 days, allowing the petition to proceed.
- Procedural Flexibility in Minor Delays
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.Delay of 11 days in refiling SLP is condoned.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a procedural order by a Registrar, not a substantive ruling on law by a Bench, specifically concerning a minor delay.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
16 Mar 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.9 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2010 CRLMP.NO(s). 5913 (From the judgement and order dated 03/11/2009 in CRLA No. 183/1995 of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT INDORE) RADHU AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP) Date: 04/05/2010 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abdul Karim Ansari, Adv. Mr. Yusuf Khan, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Adv. Ms. Pratibha Jain, Adv. Mr. Sushil Kumar Jain,Adv. Ms. Eshita Baruah, Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Delay of 11 days in refiling SLP is condoned.
(S.G.SHAH) Registrar
ns
Ø