The Managing Director vs. Sweepnal Bansal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.86 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M.A. SAYEED Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.14124-14125 of 2012 STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SHREE YOGKSHEM FNDN. FOR HUMAN DIGNITY Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for permission to file additional documents and prayer for interim relief and office report) with SLP(C) Nos.28180,28184-29229/2012 (with office report) Date: 11/02/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Neha Agarwal, Adv. Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. Ms. Shubhda, Adv. Ms. Hemantika Wahi, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay Kr. Hegde, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra I,Adv. Mr. Avinash Singh, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) Nos.14124-14125/2012 No further steps required. Counter affidavit has already been filed on record. Further necessary orders, as per rules, shall be passed as and when the other connected matters would become ready. Item No.86 -2- SLP(C) No.28180/2012 On behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 5, the learned Advocate Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh has undertaken to file vakalatnama as well as counter affidavit by the next date. The learned counsel for the petitioner to serve the complete set of the paper book to the other side. Fresh notice be issued to respondent Nos.7 and 8 through the concerned District Court besides postal service. Respondent Nos.2, 4 and 6 are reported to be duly and properly served through post but none appeared. In the remaining group of matters i.e., SLP(C)Nos.28184-28229/2012, duly represented respondents are granted four weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. It is pertinent to note that in these group of matters, respondent Nos.47 to 49 in SLP(C) Nos.28184 and respondent Nos.2 to 4 in SLP(C) Nos.28185 to 28229/2012 are yet to be served. Fresh notice be issued to the respondents through the concerned District Court besides postal service. List again on 1.4.2013. | | | (M.A. SAYEED) | | | |REGISTRAR | | | | | rd