Kare Electronics And Development Pvt. Ltd vs. Union Of India

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka, Ujjal Bhuyan
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:17 Apr 2025
CNR:SCIN010034972025

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka, Hon'ble Ujjal Bhuyan

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

List along with case [SC D No. 23542 of 2024], List before court/bench [as per ROP]

Listed On:

17 Apr 2025

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

32879/2025,32875/2025

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6564/2025

[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 26-04-2024 in WP No. 18323/2023 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]

KARE ELECTRONICS AND DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 32879/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 32875/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

WITH SLP(C) No. 9184/2025 (IA No. 72348/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 72349/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

Date : 17-04-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN

For Petitioner(s) :

Mr. N V Balaji, Adv. Mrs. N V Lakshmi, Adv. Ms. Madhumita Kesavan, Adv. Ms. Niti Richhariya, AOR

Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR

For Respondent(s) :

Mr. Raghavendra P. Shankar, A.S.G. Mr. Vivek Shetty, Adv. Mr. Nishant Upadhyay, Adv. Mr. Dhaval Vora, Adv. Mr. Navneet R., AOR

Ms. Amrita Singh, AOR

Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Veena Sivaramakrishnan, Adv. Mr. Siddhant Kant, Adv. Mr. Prateek Gupta, Adv. Ms. Apeksha, Adv. Mr. S. S. Shroff, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

We have perused the prayer clauses (a) and (b) for interim relief. The same cannot be granted. If any other interim relief is sought by the petitioners, they have to make a separate application.

To be heard along with SLP(Civil)Diary No.23542 of 2024 and connected cases.

(ANITA MALHOTRA) (AVGV RAMU) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER