Pioneer Industries vs. Union Of India Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Before:
Hon'ble Prasanna B. Varale
Stage:
DIRECTION MATTERS
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [2]
Listed On:
5 Feb 2024
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Transfer Case (Civil) No(s). 1/2015
RNT PLANTATIIONS LIMITED (OWNER LUKWAH TEA ESTATE) Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GAS AUTHORITY OF (INDIA) LTD. ANR. Respondent(s)
(ONLY TRANSFERRED CASE (C) NOs. 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 AND 79 OF 2015 are to be listed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers)
WITH
T.C.(C) No. 22/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 17/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 18/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 79/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 6/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 8/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 16/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 13/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 14/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 7/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 9/2015 (III) (FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 80620/2024 IA No. 80620/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) T.C.(C) No. 10/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 11/2015 (III) (FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS ON IA 89389/2024 IA No. 89389/2024 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS) T.C.(C) No. 12/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 15/2015 (III)
Digitally signed by
GEETA JOSHI
Date: 2024.05.13
15:53:35 IST
Signature Not Verified
T.C.(C) No. 20/2015 (III) Reason:
T.C.(C) No. 21/2015 (III)
T.C.(C) No. 19/2015 (III)
(FOR PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION ON IA 89408/2024 IA No. 89408/2024 - PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION) Date : 02-05-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE [IN CHAMBERS] For Petitioner(s) Ms. Meera Mathur, AOR Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, AOR Mr. Ali Asghar Rahim, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. N. L. Ganapathi, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R T.C.(C) No.792015
Learned counsel submits that respondent no.1 is Union of India and there is an office objection about non-service of respondent no.1 i.e. the Union of India. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner be permitted to serve the respondent no.1 i.e. i.e. the Union of India through the learned panel counsel representing the Union of India.
Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent no.1 i.e. the Union of India through the counsel representing the Union of India and to place on record the affidavit of service within two weeks.
(GEETA JOSHI) (MAMTA RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)