Kotak Mahindra Bank vs. State Of M. P.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
27 Jan 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No(s).817 of 2012 (From the judgement and order dated 23/01/2012 in MCRLC No.7310/2011, of The HIGH COURT OF M.P AT JABALPUR) KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF M.P. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for ex-Parte stay,exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and permission to file additional documents and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) NO. 818 of 2012 (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and permission to file additional documents and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) SLP(Crl) NO. 819 of 2012 (With appln(s) for ex-parte stay and exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment and office report) Date: 06/02/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE B.S. CHAUHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Salve,Sr.Adv. Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Gopal subramanium,Sr.Adv. Mr. U.U. Lalit,Sr.Adv. Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bharat Sangal,Adv. Mr. Vikram Trivedi,Adv. Mr. Fisal Sayeed, Adv. Ms. Srijana Lama, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Agarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Dr. Rajeev Dhavan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ravindra Srivastava,Sr.Adv. Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv. Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik,Adv. -2- UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Crl.) No. 817/2012 SLP(Crl.) No. 818/2012
ITEM NO.58 COURT NO.11 SECTION IIA
We are not inclined to entertain the special leave petitions. The special leave petitions are dismissed accordingly. However, the petitioners are protected for a period of eight weeks and thus no coercive measures be
taken against either of them. They may apply for bail. They are also at liberty to agitate all factual and legal issues before the Court concerned at the time of framing of the charges. The Court below shall consider the case on merit without being influenced by any observations made by the High Court. It is also made clear that we have also not expressed any opinion on merits of the cases.
SLP(Crl.) No. 819/2012
List this matter after two weeks. The petitioner is protected for a period of two weeks only.
(Deepak Mansukhani) (M.S. Negi) Court Master Court Master