Sanjay Kumar vs. Union Of India And Ors. Ministry Of Defence Secretary

SECTION XVIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ITEM No TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 377 OF 2017 Sanyay Kurnar 2018. ...Petitioner Uniong MEASUS ....Respondent <u>OFFICE REPORT</u> The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Ha<del>n'ble Court</del>y Ld. Regishar Court on $\frac{Q}{10/15}$ , 201 when the Court / he was granted / directed Fourneaks time, at last is given to all Epankr Attilau ave sespondentes to file the $11.86$ drain READY / FOR THE REASON NOT⁷ Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. as well as Dasti / through Trial Court. Post on It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received $\overline{2}$ back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks,"_ It is submilted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received $3₁$ back from sole respondent so far. If Is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been received but no one has filed Vakalahama and memo of appearance on his behalf so far. It is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Trial Court stating 古 therein that The counsel has filed an Affidavil of service after effecting Dasti service on the / has not filed Affidavit of service of dasti notice. Respondent No. Hiis submitted that comelfor Respondents W2 B.V. BalzamDas has on 5/1/16 filed et on behalf of R-1 after serving its copy on other The matter (s) is / are-listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. Dated this the $\int_A^{\mathcal{H}} I$ day of $\int$ $\mathcal{M}_{\mathcal{U}} \mathcal{A}^{\mathcal{Y}}$ 2013. ASSISTANTI REGISTRAR Copyto: $112 R P Ocopcal,$ Advocate<br> $11 R P Ocopcal,$ Advocate $\ell$ assistant registrar