Sundari Poojarthi vs. The State Of Karnataka

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 3039/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-02-2022 in WP No. 1681/2022 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)

SUNDARI POOJARTHI PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.22804/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.22802/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.22796/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No.22800/2023- APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION )

Date : 13-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. N. Ravindranath Kamath, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.N. Ramprasad, Adv. Mr. A. Karthik, AOR Mr. Sarath Janardhanan, Adv. Ms. Smrithi Suresh, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Issue notice to respondent nos. 1 to 5.

We have not issued notice to respondent no.6 in view of the limited nature of disposal we propose to make in this special leave Digitally signed by POOJA SHARMA Date: 2023.02.14 16:06:34 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

petition.

Admittedly, another writ petition filed by the petitioner herein along with one more person way back in the year 2020 is pending adjudication in the same High Court. Therefore, the apprehension of the petitioner that the fate of that writ petition may be sealed by the impugned order, deserves to be addressed. Hence, this notice.

Dasti, in addition, is permitted.

Learned counsel for the petitioner shall serve papers of the petition on the standing counsel for the State of Karnataka.

List after two weeks.

(POOJA SHARMA) COURT MASTER (SH) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) COURT MASTER (NSH)