Babu Lal(D) Tr. Lrs vs. State Of Rajasthan

¤ITEM NO.47 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).31417/2011 MOTI LAL & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date: 27/04/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish Pandey,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner states that unserved respondent No.6 is co-litigant and co-respondent with them in the impugned order and therefore, he declared him as proforma respondent in the present SLP and they do not want any judicial order against him. Therefore, he requests to let go the service upon unserved respondent No.6. His request is allowed. Remaining served respondents may file counter affidavit.

List again on 6.7.2012.

(S.G. SHAH) REGISTRAR

rd