Sameer vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
10 Apr 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
15390/2021,15396/2021,23571/2021,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1003/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-11-2020 in CRLA No. 2107/2020 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay At Aurangabad)
SAMEER Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
IA No. 15390/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 23571/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES IA No. 15396/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1132/2021 (II-A) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 17481/2021 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 17482/2021)
SLP(Crl) No. 1138/2021 (II-A) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 17602/2021 FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA 17604/2021)
Date : 04-10-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
| For Parties: | Mr. V.K. Shukla, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Arvind S. Avhad, AOR |
|---|---|
| Mr. Ranjit Balasaheb Raut, AOR | |
| Mr. Rahul Chitnis, Adv. | |
| Mr. Sachin Patil, AOR | |
| Mr. Aaditya A. Pande, Adv. | |
| Mr. Geo Joseph, Adv. |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties at some length.
Mr. V.K. Shukla, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the petitioner in SLP (Crl.) No. 1003 of 2021 has submitted that in view of the subsequent development and the fact that IBC proceedings are initiated against the Company, some of the conditions, more particularly, Condition no. (c) of the order passed by the High Court dated 29.09.2020 is not capable of being complied with. If that be so, it will be open for the respective applicants to submit an appropriate application before the High Court and point out the subsequent development and pray for appropriate relief. As and when such applications are made, the same be considered in accordance with law and on its own merits.
With this, the present Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of.
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER