Empezar Logistics Pvt. Ltd vs. Skaps Industries Indiaa Pvt, Ltd. Through Managing Director, Mr. Utkarsha N. Parikh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
23 Jan 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
° ITEM NO.304 COURT NO.5 SECTION IX S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2204/2014 (From the judgement and order dated 13/01/2014 in WPPIL No. 21/2013 of The HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD) EMPEZAR LOGISTICS PVT.LTD. Petitioner(s) VERSUS GAJUBHA (GAJENDRASINH) BHIMAJI JADEJA &O Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 17/02/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Milind Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Adv. For Rr 16 Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kirat Singh Nagra,Adv. Mr. Monish Panda, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Issue notice returnable in a month. Learned counsel for the petitioners will take necessary steps for effecting service of notice within a week. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No.1. Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate accepts notice in respect of Theramax Limited. Hence, no formal notice be issued to the Respondent Nos. 1 and 16. In the meanwhile, the units in the SEZ in respect of which the impugned order has been passed may continue to function, but no further construction activity with regard to any unit existing or upcoming, will be carried out. Respondent No. 12, Mundra Port and Special Economic Zone Ltd., and the Revisional Development Commissioner of the SEZ will file affidavits by the next date as to the units which were functioning at the time the impugned order was passed. We make it clear that the direction to the Ministry of Environment and Forests to complete the process of environmental clearance is not stayed by us. This direction is without prejudice to the case of the petitioners that no further clearance was required from the Ministry of Environment and Forests. List after one month. Tag with SLP(C) NO. 1526 of 2014. | | | | |[KALYANI GUPTA] | |[SHARDA KAPOOR] | |COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |