Sudhir Kumar Yadav @ Sudhir Singh @ Sudhir Kumar vs. The State Of Bihar

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:21 Mar 2022
CNR:SCIN010024822022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed

Listed On:

21 Mar 2022

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Revised

ITEM NO.35 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1821/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-10-2019 in CRLM No. 66802/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Patna)

SUDHIR KUMAR YADAV @ SUDHIR SINGH @ SUDHIR KUMAR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)

WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1235/2022 (II-A)

Date : 21-03-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishan Pal Mavi, AOR

Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR

Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv.

  • Mr. Priyesh Kumar Jaiswal, Adv.
  • Mr. Sumit Kumar Singh, Adv.
  • Ms. Shweta Kumari, Adv.
  • Mr. Chinmay Kumar, Adv.
  • For Respondent(s) Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishi K Awasthi, Adv. Ms. Ritu Arora, Adv. Mr. Piyush Vatsa, Adv. Mr. Sumeet Raj, Adv. Ms. Yukti Anand, Adv. Mr. Avinash Ankit, Adv. Signature Not Verified

Mr. Santosh Kumar-I, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(Crl) No.1821/2022

Perused the affidavit of Status report.

The charge sheet has been filed against the accused who has been taken into custody as investigation is complete qua him but in view of two other accused not joining the investigation (including the petitioner), charge sheet has not been filed against them.

Looking to the facts of the case and the quantum of recovery, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, on the larger issue posed by us, the matter will come up on 04.05.2022 as already directed vide order dated 08.03.2022.

SLP(Crl) No. 1235/2022

On hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the particular facts of the case, including the marriage of the sister of the petitioner, we grant five week's time to the petitioner to surrender.

The Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of.

2

On the regular bail application being filed, the same will be considered in accordance with law expeditiously.

[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

* Revised qua appearance only.

ITEM NO.35 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1821/2022

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-10-2019 in CRLM No. 66802/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Patna) SUDHIR KUMAR YADAV @ SUDHIR SINGH @ SUDHIR KUMAR Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 1235/2022 (II-A) Date : 21-03-2022 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishan Pal Mavi, AOR Mr. Smarhar Singh, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Priyesh Kumar Jaiswal, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Shweta Kumari, Adv. Mr. Chinmay Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar-I, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(Crl) No.1821/2022

Perused the affidavit of Status report.

The charge sheet has been filed against the accused who has been taken into custody as investigation is complete qua him but in view of two other accused not joining the investigation (including the petitioner), charge sheet has not been filed against them.

Looking to the facts of the case and the quantum of recovery, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

However, on the larger issue posed by us, the matter will come up on 04.05.2022 as already directed vide order dated 08.03.2022.

SLP(Crl) No. 1235/2022

On hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the particular facts of the case, including the marriage of the sister of the petitioner, we grant five week's time to the petitioner to surrender.

The Special Leave Petitions stand disposed of.

On the regular bail application being filed, the same will be considered in accordance with law expeditiously.

[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(13) - 19 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 2 May 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 14 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 23 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 9 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 11 Oct 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 24 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 26 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 4 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 21 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(3) - 8 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 24 Feb 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 23 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view