Sudhir Kumar Yadav @ Sudhir Singh @ Sudhir Kumar vs. The State Of Bihar

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Abhay S. Oka, Vikram Nath
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:23 Jan 2023
CNR:SCIN010024822022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka

Stage:

BAIL MATTERS

Remarks:

List On (Date) [14-03-2023]

Listed On:

23 Jan 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 1821/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-10-2019 in CRLM No. 66802/2019 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Patna)

SUDHIR KUMAR YADAV @ SUDHIR SINGH @ SUDHIR KUMAR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR Respondent(s)

([THE INSTANT MATTER HAS BEEN DISMISSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT VIDE ORDER DATED 21.3.2022. HOWEVER, ON THE LARGER ISSUE POSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT, THE MATTER IS BEING LISTED BEFORE THE HON'BLE COURT]

Date : 23-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

17:10:56 IST Reason:

Signature Not Verified

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Krishan Pal Mavi, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, AOR Amicus Curie

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Atmaram Ns Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rishi Kumar Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Piyush Vatsa, Adv. Ms. Ritu Arora, Adv. Mr. Usman G Khan, Adv. Mr. Avinash Ankit, Adv. Mr. Rahul K Gupta, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

RE : LARGER ISSUE POSED BY THE HON'BLE COURT Digitally signed by Charanjeet Kaur Date: 2023.01.23

The supplementary affidavit filed by the State Government on 21.03.2023 shows that the

setting up of the special courts physically is a long distance away. We are still at the stage of planning the infrastructure.

Insofar as the second aspect to be examined is concerned, prima facie it appears that the stand of the High Court may have merit but subject to what learned counsel for the State has to submit.

Learned counsel for the State requests for a week's accommodation to obtain requisite instructions, otherwise we will examine the aspect and pass necessary orders.

Learned counsel for the State also refers to the affidavit to say that insofar as disposal of cases is concerned, with the setting up of the special courts, there is an improvement in the same.

List on 14.03.2023.

[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)

2

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(13) - 19 Jul 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 2 May 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 14 Mar 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 23 Jan 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(9) - 9 Dec 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 11 Oct 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 24 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 26 Jul 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 4 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 21 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 8 Mar 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 24 Feb 2022

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 23 Feb 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view